Accurate thermal characterization of building insulation materials is essential for reliable energy performance assessment, regulatory compliance, and the development of high-performance envelopes. On one hand, the growing adoption of innovative insulating products, such as nanoporous materials, aerogel-based composites, bio-based panels, and thin insulating coatings, helps to enhance buildings’ energy efficiency by means of sustainable raw materials. On the other hand, conventional measurement techniques encounter significant challenges, due to their heterogeneity, reduced thickness, and unconventional geometries. In this study, an intra-laboratory comparison of three widely used methods for thermal conductivity determination is presented: the Transient Plane Source (TPS, Hot Disk) method, the Guarded Hot Plate (GHP) method, and the Heat Flow Meter (HFM) method. A total of twelve insulating materials, spanning super-insulating cores, insulating renders, bio-based panels, and nanocomposite coatings, were experimentally characterized under controlled laboratory conditions. A view on the analyzed insulating materials’ cradle-to-grave environmental impact is also given, to enhance the users’ awareness for the highly informed choice. The results highlight systematic differences between transient and steady-state approaches, with TPS measurements generally exhibiting larger deviations for materials characterized by surface roughness, limited thickness, or strong internal heterogeneity. In contrast, GHP and HFM methods show closer agreement when specimen geometry and stabilization requirements are satisfied. The influence of contact resistance, probing depth, specimen preparation, and uncertainty propagation is critically analyzed for each technique. The study provides practical insights into the applicability limits of commonly used thermal characterization methods and emphasizes the importance of selecting measurement techniques in relation to material morphology and testing constraints. These findings support more reliable thermal property assessment of emerging insulation materials and contribute to improved consistency between laboratory measurements and energy performance evaluations for buildings.
Baldinelli et al. (Sat,) studied this question.