What question did this study set out to answer?

This research evaluates the ecological health of the Upper Napo River Basin by integrating various biological and chemical indicators in response to human activities.

May 7, 2026Open Access

Ecosystem Health of Andean–Amazonian Rivers: Integrating Macroinvertebrate Diversity, Microbiological Loads and Chemical Signatures Across Anthropogenic Gradients

Key Points

This research evaluates the ecological health of the Upper Napo River Basin by integrating various biological and chemical indicators in response to human activities.
Integrated analysis of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages, physicochemical, and microbiological indicators across 45 sites.
Assessment under four impact scenarios: Few Threats, Crop/Aquaculture, Gold Mining, and Wastewater Discharge.
Sampled a total of 2285 individuals representing 62 families to determine ecological quality metrics.
Reference sites exhibited high integrity (q0 = 24.3 families), while Gold Mining sites showed catastrophic defaunation (q0 = 9.9 families).
Wastewater sites recorded critically high fecal coliform levels (33,708 ± 58,047 CFU/100 mL), indicating severe impacts on aquatic health (EQR = 0.28).
Crop/Aquaculture sites showed intermediate degradation (EQR = 0.37–0.38), connecting pesticide exposure to reduced biodiversity.

Abstract

The Western Amazon is a global biodiversity hotspot, yet the Upper Napo River Basin (UNRB) remains understudied regarding aquatic ecosystem health along anthropogenic gradients. We integrated benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages with physicochemical and microbiological indicators across 45 sites to assess ecological quality under four impact scenarios: Few Threats (FT, reference sites; n = 6), Crop/Aquaculture (CA; n = 22), Gold Mining (GM; n = 10), and Wastewater Discharge (WD; n = 7). Analysis of 2285 individuals (62 families) revealed clear degradation across the anthropogenic gradient. Reference sites (FT) exhibited high integrity (q0 = 24.3 families), establishing the regional baseline for Andean–Amazonian freshwater ecosystems. In stark contrast, GM sites showed catastrophic defaunation (q0 = 9.9 families) coupled with extreme turbidity (1320 ± 1589 NTU) and heavy metal mobilization (Fe: 430 ± 229 µg/L; Cu: 338 ± 128 µg/L), placing these reaches in “Bad” ecological status (Ecological Quality Ratio, EQR ≤ 0.16). Wastewater sites reached critical fecal coliform levels (33,708 ± 58,047 CFU/100 mL)—165-fold higher than FT sites—indicating severe sanitary impairment and community collapse (EQR = 0.28, dominated by Chironomidae at 80%). The application of ASPT (Average Score Per Taxon) and EQR proved essential for detecting functional shifts toward tolerant assemblages even when raw biotic scores appeared moderate. Crop/Aquaculture sites showed intermediate degradation (EQR = 0.37–0.38), reflecting chronic pesticide exposure and habitat loss. We conclude that gold mining and wastewater discharge are the primary drivers pushing the UNRB toward ecological collapse, with GM exerting the most severe impact on aquatic biodiversity. Safeguarding this global freshwater stronghold requires immediate implementation of multimetric biomonitoring, enhanced mining regulation, wastewater treatment infrastructure, and establishment of Indigenous-led fluvial reserves to maintain long-term connectivity.

Ecosystem Health of Andean–Amazonian Rivers: Integrating Macroinvertebrate Diversity, Microbiological Loads and Chemical Signatures Across Anthropogenic Gradients

Key Points

Abstract

Cite This Study