Using a subset of the Transport Canada dataset of rearward-facing CRS in full-frontal rigid barrier vehicle tests, the aim of the current study was to evaluate CRS and/or ATD head contact with the front-row seatback and categorize the contribution to the peak ATD head acceleration. For 33 cases of ATDs seated in rearward-facing CRS models installed in the second-row outboard seats across 19 vehicle tests, high-speed video footage was analyzed to identify instances and timings of CRS and/or ATD head contact with the front-row seatback. The timing of contact was compared to the ATD head acceleration time history to identify instances of “contributory contact” with the front-row seatback, which was defined as contact occurring before the ATD head acceleration was within 10 g of the peak. ATD contributory contact cases involved both the ATD head and CRS contacting the front-row seat, whereas CRS contributory contact cases involved only the CRS, but not the ATD head, contacting the front-row seat. No contributory contact cases were those that involved either ATD or CRS contact with the front-row seatback, but the contact occurred after the time point associated with 10 g below the peak ATD head acceleration. No contact cases were those that did not involve either ATD or CRS contact with the front-row seatback. Contributory CRS and/or ATD contact with the front-row seatback was found to be associated with increased head injury risk. Therefore, the energy-absorbing properties of the CRS head restraint and/or front-row seatback are likely important considerations regarding frontal crash protection for rearward-facing pediatric second-row occupants. Impact velocity, location, and angle were able to be calculated for two cases that involved contributory ATD contact with the front-row seatback. Such data could be used as boundary conditions for physical testing of front-row seatbacks and computational modeling.
Patton et al. (Mon,) studied this question.