Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVE: Twin concordance data for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on their own provide only limited insight into the relative genetic and environmental contribution to the disease. We applied quantitative genetic methods to assess the heritability of RA and to examine for evidence of differences in the genetic contribution according to sex, age, and clinical disease characteristics. METHODS: Data were analyzed from 2 previously published nationwide studies of twins with RA conducted in Finland and the United Kingdom. Heritability was assessed by variance components analysis. Differences in the genetic contribution by sex, age, age at disease onset, and clinical characteristics were examined by stratification. The power of the twin study design to detect these differences was examined through simulation. RESULTS: The heritability of RA was 65% (95% confidence interval 95% CI 50-77) in the Finnish data and 53% (95% CI 40-65) in the UK data. There was no significant difference in the strength of the genetic contribution according to sex, age, age at onset, or disease severity subgroup. Both study designs had power to detect a contribution of at least 40% from the common family environment, and a difference in the genetic contribution of at least 50% between subgroups. CONCLUSION: Genetic factors have a substantial contribution to RA in the population, accounting for approximately 60% of the variation in liability to disease. Although tempered by power considerations, there is no evidence in these twin data that the overall genetic contribution to RA differs by sex, age, age at disease onset, and disease severity.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alex J. MacGregor
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
Harold Snieder
Preventive Cardiology
Alan S. Rigby
Heart Failure & Transplant
Arthritis & Rheumatism
University of Manchester
University of Helsinki
Boston Children's Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
MacGregor et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69ff47bc2ff633f36577728b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(200001)43:1<30::aid-anr5>3.0.co;2-b
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: