Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
A well-regarded as well as powerful method named the ‘analytic hierarchy process’ (AHP) uses mathematics and psychology for making and analysing complex decisions. This article aims to present a brief review of the consistency measure of the judgments in AHP. Judgments should not be random or illogical. Several researchers have developed different consistency measures to identify the rationality of judgments. This article summarises the consistency measures which have been proposed so far in the literature. Moreover, this paper describes briefly the functional relationships established in the literature among the well-known consistency indices. At last, some thoughtful research directions that can be helpful in further research to develop and improve the performance of AHP are provided as well.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Pant et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69ff7e8db124fe58198577c4 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math10081206
Sangeeta Pant
Symbiosis International University
Anuj Kumar
Argonne National Laboratory
Mangey Ram
Graphic Era University
Mathematics
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
University of Petroleum and Energy Studies
Graphic Era University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: