Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
It has been suggested that the internal dynamics of dwarf spheroidal galaxies (dSphs) can be used to test whether or not ultralight axions with mₐ 10^-22eV are a preferred dark matter candidate. However, comparisons to theoretical predictions tend to be inconclusive for the simple reason that while most cosmological models consider only dark matter, one observes only baryons. Here we use realistic kinematic mock data catalogs of Milky Way dSph's to show that the "mass-anisotropy degeneracy" in the Jeans equations leads to biased bounds on the axion mass in galaxies with unknown dark matter halo profiles. In galaxies with multiple chemodynamical components this bias can be partly removed by modelling the mass enclosed within each subpopulation. However, analysis of the mock data reveals that the least-biased constraints on the axion mass result from fitting the luminosity-averaged velocity dispersion of the individual chemodynamical components directly. Applying our analysis to two dSph's with reported stellar subcomponents, Fornax and Sculptor, and assuming that the halo profile has not been acted on by baryons, yields core radii r₂>1. 5 kpc and rc> 1. 2 kpc respectively, and mₐ<0. 4 10^-22eV at 97. 5\% confidence. These bounds are in tension with the number of observed satellites derived from simple (but conservative) estimates of the subhalo mass function in Milky Way-like galaxies. We discuss how baryonic feedback might affect our results, and the impact of such a small axion mass on the growth of structures in the Universe.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alma X. González‐Morales
Universidad de Guanajuato
David J. E. Marsh
King's College London
Jorge Peñarrubia
Royal Observatory
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
University of Edinburgh
King's College London
Royal Observatory
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
González‐Morales et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a006bafda5c1eb07f2da926 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1941
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: