PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 12, 2019Heart40 citationsOpen Access

Reducing weight and increasing physical activity in people at high risk of cardiovascular disease: a randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of enhanced motivational interviewing intervention with usual care

KIKhalida IsmailABAdam BayleyKTKatherine Twist

Structured PICO

Does enhanced motivational interviewing improve physical activity and reduce weight in patients aged 40-74 years at high risk of cardiovascular disease?

P
Population
1,742 patients aged 40-74 years at high risk of cardiovascular disease (QRisk2 score ≥20.0%, indicating probability of a CVD event in the next 10 years).
I
Intervention
Enhanced motivational interviewing including additional behaviour change techniques, delivered by health trainers in 10 sessions over 1 year, in either group (n=697) or individual (n=523) format.
C
Comparator
Usual care (n=522).
O
Outcome
Physical activity (mean steps/day) and weight (kg) at 24 months.surrogate

An intensive 1-year enhanced motivational interviewing intervention delivered in group or individual formats did not significantly improve physical activity, weight, or cardiovascular risk scores compared to usual care in high-risk patients.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The epidemic of obesity is contributing to the increasing prevalence of people at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), negating the medical advances in reducing CVD mortality. We compared the clinical and cost-effectiveness of an intensive lifestyle intervention consisting of enhanced motivational interviewing in reducing weight and increasing physical activity for patients at high risk of CVD. METHODS: A three-arm, single-blind, parallel-group randomised controlled trial was conducted in consenting primary care centres in south London. We recruited patients aged 40-74 years with a QRisk2 score ≥20.0%, which indicates the probability of having a CVD event in the next 10 years. The intervention was enhanced motivational interviewing which included additional behaviour change techniques and was delivered by health trainers in 10 sessions over 1 year, in either group (n=697) or individual (n=523) format. The third arm received usual care (UC; n=522). The primary outcomes were physical activity (mean steps/day) and weight (kg). Secondary outcomes were changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and CVD risk score. We estimated the relative cost-effectiveness of each intervention. RESULTS: At 24 months, the group and individual interventions were not more effective than UC in increasing physical activity (mean difference=70.05 steps, 95% CI -288.00 to 147.90 and mean difference=7.24 steps, 95% CI -224.01 to 238.50, respectively), reducing weight (mean difference=-0.03 kg, 95% CI -0.49 to 0.44 and mean difference=-0.42 kg, 95% CI -0.93 to 0.09, respectively) or improving any secondary outcomes. The group and individual interventions were not cost-effective at conventional thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: Enhancing motivational interviewing with additional behaviour change techniques was not effective in reducing weight or increasing physical activity in those at high CVD risk.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ismail et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a036c561d52164a4d81e9d3https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315656
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper