This article examines the evolution and strategic use of interim relief and emergency arbitration in international arbitration, focusing on the ICDR/AAA framework. It highlights the procedural innovations introduced by the ICDR in 2006, the distinction between standard and emergency measures, and the practical challenges of enforcement across jurisdictions. Drawing on empirical data and institutional practice, the article offers insights into the effectiveness of these tools and provides recommendations for their optimal use in urgent disputes.
Ana Lombardía Villalba (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: