This paper critically examines the political, social, and philosophical dimensions of Mukta-Dhara by Rabindranath Tagore, with particular emphasis on Tagore's critique of political oppression, mechanized civilization, racial prejudice, and exploitative systems of governance. As one of Tagore's most accomplished symbolic dramas, Mukta-Dhara presents a profound conflict between humanity and machinery, freedom and authoritarian control, spiritual values and materialistic ambition. The paper explores how the symbolic representation of the dam constructed by the engineer Bibhuti becomes an instrument of imperial domination over the people of Shiv-tarai, reflecting Tagore's deep distrust of science when detached from ethical responsibility and human compassion. Through the contrasting characterization of King Ranajit, Bibhuti, and Prince Abhijit, the play articulates Tagore's democratic ideals and his advocacy of freedom, justice, and human dignity. Abhijit emerges as a symbolic liberator whose selfsacrifice restores the natural flow of Mukta-Dhara and symbolizes the triumph of humanity over tyranny and mechanical oppression. The paper further analyses Tagore's criticism of racial arrogance, economic exploitation, and regimental education that suppresses independent thought and promotes blind nationalism. Employing textual and thematic analysis, this paper demonstrates that Mukta-Dhara transcends its immediate socio-political context to offer a universal humanistic vision relevant to contemporary debates on technology, authoritarianism, ecological ethics, and social justice. The paper concludes that Tagore's symbolic imagination transforms the play into atimeless critique of dehumanized modernity and an enduring affirmation of liberty, moral courage, and spiritual fulfillment.
K.V. Sridevi (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: