The relevance of the research topic has been determined. The work has achieved the research goal of substantiating theoretical approaches to defining geoecological monitoring of the restoration of transport infrastructure lands. The following theoretical approaches are proposed: functional: the directions and features of the development of geo-ecological monitoring are determined; regulatory and legal: the regulatory and legal aspects of the formation and application of geo-ecological monitoring of land use for the restoration of transport infrastructure in regions are substantiated; ecological: focuses on the ecological directions of monitoring procedures; stakeholder: characterises the level and features of interaction between interested parties in the development and implementation of geo-ecological monitoring of land use for the restoration of transport infrastructure in regions; monitoring: determines the areas and characteristics of monitoring procedures; structural: identifies the structural elements of geo-ecological monitoring of land use for the reconstruction of regional transport infrastructure; systemic: geo-ecological monitoring is considered as a set of land, environmental, transport and security factors that ensure the implementation of monitoring procedures and the interaction of stakeholders to improve the efficiency of land use for the reconstruction of transport infrastructure. Summarising theoretical and methodological approaches and as a result of systematising regulatory and legal support, it is proposed to define geo-ecological monitoring of land use for reconstruction as a system consisting of land, environmental, transport and security factors that form the quantitative basis for monitoring using mathematical methods and models, geodetic and geoinformation support, which allows for more efficient land use for the reconstruction of transport infrastructure, taking into account the level and characteristics of stakeholder interaction
Iurchenko et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: