PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 1998Heart260 citationsOpen Access

Secondary prevention in coronary heart disease: a randomised trial of nurse led clinics in primary care

NCNeil CampbellLRLewis RitchieJTJ. Thain

Key Result

Nurse-led clinics in primary care significantly improved secondary prevention in patients with coronary heart disease, with an adjusted mean improvement of 0.55 components (95% CI 0.44-0.67).

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=1,173)

Randomization

Randomised

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Do nurse-led clinics improve secondary prevention measures in patients with coronary heart disease?

P
Population
1,173 patients (685 men and 488 women) under 80 years with working diagnoses of coronary heart disease, without terminal illness or dementia and not housebound, from 19 general practices in northeast Scotland.
I
Intervention
Nurse run clinics promoting medical and lifestyle aspects of secondary prevention and offering regular follow up.
O
Outcome
Components of secondary prevention (aspirin use, blood pressure management, lipid management, physical activity, dietary fat, and smoking status) and a cumulative score assessed at one year.surrogate

Nurse-led clinics in primary care significantly improve the implementation of secondary prevention measures, including medication use and lifestyle modifications, in patients with coronary heart disease.

Main Result

Effect estimate: Mean improvement 0.55 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.67)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether nurse run clinics in general practice improve secondary prevention in patients with coronary heart disease. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: A random sample of 19 general practices in northeast Scotland. PATIENTS: 1173 patients (685 men and 488 women) under 80 years with working diagnoses of coronary heart disease, but without terminal illness or dementia and not housebound. INTERVENTION: Nurse run clinics promoted medical and lifestyle aspects of secondary prevention and offered regular follow up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Components of secondary prevention assessed at baseline and one year were: aspirin use; blood pressure management; lipid management; physical activity; dietary fat; and smoking status. A cumulative score was generated by counting the number of appropriate components of secondary prevention for each patient. RESULTS: There were significant improvements in aspirin management (odds ratio 3.22, 95% confidence interval 2.15 to 4.80), blood pressure management (5.32, 3.01 to 9.41), lipid management (3.19, 2.39 to 4.26), physical activity (1.67, 1.23 to 2.26) and diet (1.47, 1.10 to 1.96). There was no effect on smoking cessation (0.78, 0.47 to 1.28). Of six possible components of secondary prevention, the baseline mean was 3.27. The adjusted mean improvement attributable to intervention was 0.55 of a component (0.44 to 0.67). Improvement was found regardless of practice baseline performance. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse run clinics proved practical to implement in general practice and effectively increased secondary prevention in coronary heart disease. Most patients gained at least one effective component of secondary prevention and, for them, future cardiovascular events and mortality could be reduced by up to a third.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Campbell et al. (1998) conducted an RCT in Coronary heart disease (n=1,173). Nurse run clinics was evaluated on Cumulative score of appropriate components of secondary prevention (Mean improvement 0.55, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.67). Nurse-led clinics in primary care significantly improved secondary prevention in patients with coronary heart disease, with an adjusted mean improvement of 0.55 components (95% CI 0.44-0.67).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a073b3055897739608443f2https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.80.5.447
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper