Decidualization in the human endometrium is not merely a hormone-dependent differentiation process; rather, it represents a multilayered adaptive program characterized by the tight integration of immune regulation, metabolic reprogramming, and cellular stress responses. In this review, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and the associated unfolded protein response (UPR) are proposed as central regulatory mechanisms governing this process. Triggered by increased protein synthesis and secretory demand, UPR activation under physiological conditions preserves proteostasis and supports the secretory capacity of stromal cells. In contrast, chronic or dysregulated activation leads to a maladaptive response characterized by apoptosis, inflammation, and metabolic dysfunction. UPR signaling pathways shape immune tolerance through their effects on macrophage polarization, uterine natural killer (uNK) cell function, and T cell balance. At the metabolic level, adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) regulates cellular adaptation through bidirectional interactions with mitochondrial function and redox homeostasis. Within this framework, the ER stress–immune–metabolic axis operates not as a linear pathway but as a dynamic network incorporating multiple feedback loops, thereby constituting a critical threshold mechanism that determines the success of decidualization. Disruption of this axis provides a shared mechanistic basis for pathologies such as recurrent implantation failure, pregnancy loss, and preeclampsia. From a therapeutic perspective, agents including chemical chaperones, UPR modulators, AMPK activators, and anti-inflammatory compounds hold translational potential by targeting these pathological feedback circuits. However, key knowledge gaps remain, particularly regarding the cell type-specific and temporal regulation of ER stress, the molecular boundaries defining the transition from adaptive to pathological states, and interspecies differences. Future studies employing single-cell omics approaches and functional in vivo models will be essential to elucidate the dynamic organization of this axis and to enable the development of targeted and personalized therapeutic strategies.
Karaoğlan et al. (Thu,) studied this question.