PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2018Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions93 citationsOpen Access

Current understanding of magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers and memory in Alzheimer's disease

View Full Paper
EBEce BayramJCJessica CaldwellSBSarah J. Banks

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is caused by a cascade of changes to brain integrity. Neuroimaging biomarkers are important in diagnosis and monitoring the effects of interventions. As memory impairments are among the first symptoms of AD, the relationship between imaging findings and memory deficits is important in biomarker research. The most established magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) finding is hippocampal atrophy, which is related to memory decline and currently used as a diagnostic criterion for AD. While the medial temporal lobes are impacted early by the spread of neurofibrillary tangles, other networks and regional changes can be found quite early in the progression. Atrophy in several frontal and parietal regions, cortical thinning, and white matter alterations correlate with memory deficits in early AD. Changes in activation and connectivity have been detected by functional MRI (fMRI). Task-based fMRI studies have revealed medial temporal lobe hypoactivation, parietal hyperactivation, and frontal hyperactivation in AD during memory tasks, and activation patterns of these regions are also altered in preclinical and prodromal AD. Resting state fMRI has revealed alterations in default mode network activity related to memory in early AD. These studies are limited in part due to the historic inclusion of patients who had suspected AD but likely did not have the disorder. Modern biomarkers allow for more diagnostic certainty, allowing better understanding of neuroimaging markers in true AD, even in the preclinical stage. Larger patient cohorts, comparison of candidate imaging biomarkers to more established biomarkers, and inclusion of more detailed neuropsychological batteries to assess multiple aspects of memory are needed to better understand the memory deficit in AD and help develop new biomarkers. This article reviews MRI findings related to episodic memory impairments in AD and introduces a new study with multimodal imaging and comprehensive neuropsychiatric evaluation to overcome current limitations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bayram et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a09622287ad1657d2513ed8https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2018.04.007
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Functional deactivations: Change with age and dementia of the Alzheimer type2003 · 739 citations
  2. 2Neuropsychological profile of prodromal Alzheimer's disease (Prd-AD) and their radiological correlates2010 · 41 citations
  3. 3Evidence of Neuronal Compensation During Episodic Memory in Subjective Memory Impairment2011 · 148 citations
  4. 4Enhanced resting-state functional connectivity between core memory-task activation peaks is associated with memory impairment in MCI2016 · 30 citations
  5. 5Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: Topological Reorganization of the Default-Mode Network2013 · 70 citations