Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Triaxial compression tests were run to compare the stress‐strain response of a sand reinforced with continuous, oriented fabric layers as opposed to randomly distributed, discrete fibers. The influence of various test parameters such as amount of reinforcement, confining stress, and inclusion modulus and surface friction were also investigated. Test results showed that both types of reinforcement improved strength, increased the axial strain at failure, and in most cases reduced post‐peak loss of strength. At very low strains (<1%) fabric inclusions resulted in a loss of compressive stiffness. This effect was not observed in the case of fiber reinforcement. The existence of a critical confining stress was common to both systems. Failure envelopes for reinforced sand paralleled the unreinforced envelope above this stress. Strength increase was generally proportional to the amount of reinforcement, i.e., the number of fabric layers or weight fraction of fibers, up to some limiting content. Thereafter, the strength increase approached an asymptotic upper limit. Fiber‐reinforced samples failed along a classic planar shear plane, whereas fabric‐reinforced sand failed by bulging between layers.
Gray et al. (Fri,) studied this question.