Nurse-led lifestyle counselling did not reduce blood pressure but lessened waist circumference gain (mean difference 3.1 cm; 95% CI 1.2-5.0; p=0.04) and reduced triglycerides compared to usual care.
RCT (n=51)
randomly allocated
Does monthly nurse-led lifestyle counselling improve components of the metabolic syndrome in patients with mild hypertension?
Nurse-led lifestyle counselling in patients with mild hypertension effectively mitigates the worsening of metabolic risk factors such as waist circumference and triglycerides, despite no significant additional blood pressure reduction.
Effect estimate: Mean difference 3.1 cm (95% CI 1.2-5.0)
p-value: p=0.04
BACKGROUND: Hypertension often clusters with metabolic risk factors and its optimal treatment may involve a number of changes in lifestyle. Nurse-led care regarding lifestyle change may improve outcomes in cardiovascular disease prevention involving. OBJECTIVE: To examine if lifestyle guidance given by a nurse improved components of the metabolic syndrome including blood pressure, lipids and waist circumference. SUBJECTS AND DESIGN: Subjects that participated in a health screening with systolic blood pressure 140-169 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure 90-99 mm Hg at a minimum of three separate readings treated or not treated with antihypertensive drugs were randomly allocated either to monthly nurse-led lifestyle counselling (intervention group, N=31) or to conventional primary care (control group, N=20) to be followed by lifestyle counselling. RESULTS: The mean (S.D.) baseline and end of study blood pressure was 157 (9)/94 (6) mm Hg and 147 (9)/91 (8) mm Hg, respectively, in the intervention group versus 153 (9)/94 (4) and 143 (10)/92 (8) mm Hg, respectively, in the control group (NS between the groups). Waist circumference increased significantly between baseline and 6 months in the control but not in the intervention (mean difference between the groups, 3.1 cm 95% CI 1.2-5.0, p=0.04) and serum triglyceride concentrations were reduced in the intervention compared with the control group (mean difference, 0.56 mmol/l 95% CI 0.22-0.90, p=0.03). The number of risk factors of the metabolic syndrome was 2.1 (S.D. 1.1) at baseline and 2.6 (S.D. 1.2) at 6 months in the control group versus 2.2 (S.D. 1.1) and 1.9 (S.D. 1.0), respectively, in the intervention group (p=0.01). Change in triglycerides was correlated with change in weight (Pearson's correlation coefficient=0.73, p=0.001) and waist circumference (Pearson's correlation coefficient=0.63, p=0.009) in the control group. CONCLUSION: Nurse counselling did not reduce blood pressure but was associated with a lesser gain in waist circumference and reduced triglyceride concentrations. Metabolic risk factors may worsen rapidly in patients with mild hypertension in the waiting period for lifestyle intervention.
Tonstad et al. (Fri,) conducted a rct in Mild hypertension (n=51). Nurse-led lifestyle counselling vs. Conventional primary care was evaluated on Waist circumference (Mean difference 3.1 cm, 95% CI 1.2-5.0, p=0.04). Nurse-led lifestyle counselling did not reduce blood pressure but lessened waist circumference gain (mean difference 3.1 cm; 95% CI 1.2-5.0; p=0.04) and reduced triglycerides compared to usual care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: