This preprint is the second module of the TEBAC Hodge program. It develops the variation-theoretic and Hodge-locus infrastructure needed for a Clay-compatible modular attack on the rational Hodge conjecture. The module does not claim a completed proof of the Hodge conjecture. Its purpose is to organize the passage from the fixed residual obstruction package of HODGE-I to the later detector no-loss theorem target. Starting from the HODGE-I carrier and obstruction dataXᵖ: = H^2p (X, Q) H^p, p (X), ᵖ (X): =spanₐ\\, cl (Z): Z X algebraic of codimension p\, \, Xᵖ: =KXᵖ/Aᵖ (X), paper introduces variation of Hodge structure, the Gauss--Manin local system, Hodge loci, and algebraicity windows as the natural geometric environment in which residual Hodge classes and algebraic cycle classes can be compared. The Cattani--Deligne--Kaplan theorem is used only as an admissible infrastructure theorem asserting the algebraicity of Hodge loci in the base of an algebraic family. The module explicitly separates this base-algebraicity statement from the still-unproved cycle-algebraicity assertion required by the Hodge conjecture. The main output of HODGE-II is a precise reduction of the next decisive front to detector completeness: (₊ₗ㵵) ^Aᵖ (X) =0. , the later HODGE-III module must prove that every nonzero rational Hodge detector\0 (KXᵖ) ^ detected by some algebraic cycle class: \ (cl (Z) ) 0. \ Thus HODGE-II closes the variation/Hodge-locus/algebraicity-window module of the TEBAC Hodge program and prepares the first genuine battlefront toward the full Clay-level Hodge conjecture: detector no-loss and algebraic cycle separation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tosho Lazarov Karadzhov (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d4fd2f03e14405aa9b4ea — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20275905
Tosho Lazarov Karadzhov
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...