PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 17, 1923JAMA51 citations

Relation of Clinical to Necropsy Diagnosis in Cancer and Value of Existing Cancer Statistics

View Full Paper
HWH. Gideon Wells

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Among the factors often mentioned as responsible for the undeniable fact that more deaths from cancer have been recorded in recent years than formerly is the increment of cases of cancer recognized at necropsy that were unrecognized during life. These added cases help to swell the cancer death rate; and hence, the more advanced the medical profession of a given community, the more necropsies, and the smaller the number of cancers that escape inclusion in the vital statistics of the community. The experience of necropsy disclosure of a clinically unrecognized malignant growth is so common that this factor is always brought forward when the alleged increase in the frequency of cancer is under discussion; and it is universally admitted. Despite the recognition and acceptance of this factor, however, we have very little in the way of actual evidence as to its real importance. The most quoted paper is that of

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

H. Gideon Wells (1923) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d545f389a567298ba72e0https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1923.02640380001001
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper