Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The signaling steps that induce cardiac differentiation in embryonic stem (ES) cells are incompletely understood. We examined the effect of adhesion signaling including Src and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) on cardiogenesis in mouse ES cells using α-myosin heavy chain promoter-driven enhanced green fluorescent protein or luciferase as reporters. Cardiac transcription factors including Nkx2.5 and Tbx5 mRNA were first expressed at day 4 in hanging drop embryoid bodies, and adhesion of embryoid bodies to surfaces at or before that day strongly inhibited differentiation of ES cells to cardiomyocytes. Since adhesion signaling could suppress cardiogenesis through Src kinases, embryoid bodies were exposed to the small molecule PP2, known as a Src family kinase inhibitor. PP2 during embryoid body adhesion dramatically increased cardiomyocyte differentiation and decreased mRNA expression of neuronal cellular adhesion molecule and α-fetoprotein, neuroectodermal, and endodermal markers, respectively. Surprisingly, although there was an interaction between Src and FAK in cardiogenesis, the procardiogenic effect of PP2 appeared incompletely explained by Src kinase inhibition, since another Src family kinase inhibitor, SU6656, failed to induce cardiogenesis. Instead, PP2 specifically inhibited adhesion-induced FAK phosphorylation. In ES cells stably expressing FAK-related nonkinase, which functions as a dominant negative FAK, cell migration from embryoid bodies was inhibited, whereas α-myosin heavy chain expression and myosin-stained cardiomyocytes were increased, suggesting that reducing cell motility may contribute to cardiogenesis. These data indicate that FAK is a key regulator of cardiogenesis in mouse ES cells and that FAK signaling within embryoid bodies can direct stem cell lineage commitment. The signaling steps that induce cardiac differentiation in embryonic stem (ES) cells are incompletely understood. We examined the effect of adhesion signaling including Src and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) on cardiogenesis in mouse ES cells using α-myosin heavy chain promoter-driven enhanced green fluorescent protein or luciferase as reporters. Cardiac transcription factors including Nkx2.5 and Tbx5 mRNA were first expressed at day 4 in hanging drop embryoid bodies, and adhesion of embryoid bodies to surfaces at or before that day strongly inhibited differentiation of ES cells to cardiomyocytes. Since adhesion signaling could suppress cardiogenesis through Src kinases, embryoid bodies were exposed to the small molecule PP2, known as a Src family kinase inhibitor. PP2 during embryoid body adhesion dramatically increased cardiomyocyte differentiation and decreased mRNA expression of neuronal cellular adhesion molecule and α-fetoprotein, neuroectodermal, and endodermal markers, respectively. Surprisingly, although there was an interaction between Src and FAK in cardiogenesis, the procardiogenic effect of PP2 appeared incompletely explained by Src kinase inhibition, since another Src family kinase inhibitor, SU6656, failed to induce cardiogenesis. Instead, PP2 specifically inhibited adhesion-induced FAK phosphorylation. In ES cells stably expressing FAK-related nonkinase, which functions as a dominant negative FAK, cell migration from embryoid bodies was inhibited, whereas α-myosin heavy chain expression and myosin-stained cardiomyocytes were increased, suggesting that reducing cell motility may contribute to cardiogenesis. These data indicate that FAK is a key regulator of cardiogenesis in mouse ES cells and that FAK signaling within embryoid bodies can direct stem cell lineage commitment. Embryonic stem (ES) 3The abbreviations used are:ESembryonic stemFAKfocal adhesion kinaseMHCmyosin heavy chainGFPgreen fluorescent proteinEGFPenhanced GFPBrdUrd(+)-5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridineFRNKFAK-related nonkinaseNCAMneuronal cellular adhesion moleculePECAM-1platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1α-FPα-fetoproteinPDGFplatelet-derived growth factorERKextracellular signal-regulated kinase cells are totipotent cells derived from the inner cell mass of the preimplantation embryo (1Boheler K.R. Czyz J. Tweedie D. Yang H.T. Anisimov S.V. Wobus A.M. Circ. Res. 2002; 91: 189-201Crossref PubMed Scopus (609) Google Scholar, 2Sachinidis A. Fleischmann B.K. Kolossov E. Wartenberg M. Sauer H. Hescheler J. Cardiovasc. Res. 2003; 58: 278-291Crossref PubMed Scopus (196) Google Scholar, 3Gepstein L. Circ. Res. 2002; 91: 866-876Crossref PubMed Scopus (211) Google Scholar). Aggregation of ES cells into spheres called embryoid bodies triggers their differentiation into all three germ layers: ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm (1Boheler K.R. Czyz J. Tweedie D. Yang H.T. Anisimov S.V. Wobus A.M. Circ. Res. 2002; 91: 189-201Crossref PubMed Scopus (609) Google Scholar, 2Sachinidis A. Fleischmann B.K. Kolossov E. Wartenberg M. Sauer H. Hescheler J. Cardiovasc. Res. 2003; 58: 278-291Crossref PubMed Scopus (196) Google Scholar, 3Gepstein L. Circ. Res. 2002; 91: 866-876Crossref PubMed Scopus (211) Google Scholar). ES-derived cardiomyocytes are similar to neonatal cardiomyocytes with respect to expression of contractile proteins, ion channels, and connexins (1Boheler K.R. Czyz J. Tweedie D. Yang H.T. Anisimov S.V. Wobus A.M. Circ. Res. 2002; 91: 189-201Crossref PubMed Scopus (609) Google Scholar) and can electrically couple with other myocardial cells after cell transplantation in vivo (4Kehat I. Kenyagin-Karsenti D. Snir M. Segev H. Amit M. Gepstein A. Livne E. Binah O. Itskovitz-Eldor J. Gepstein L. J. Clin. Invest. 2001; 108: 407-414Crossref PubMed Scopus (1538) Google Scholar, 5Kehat I. Khimovich L. Caspi O. Gepstein A. Shofti R. Arbel G. Huber I. Satin J. Itskovitz-Eldor J. Gepstein L. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004; 22: 1282-1289Crossref PubMed Scopus (742) Google Scholar). Cardiogenesis of ES cells is a model for studying differentiation of cardiac myocytes as well as a possible source of cardiomyocytes for cell therapy. However, the mechanisms of cardiogenesis are incompletely understood, and current differentiation methods are inefficient in both mouse and human ES cells. Chemical compounds and endogenous substances such as Me2SO, 5-azacytidine, retinoic acid, ascorbic acid, nitric oxide, oxytocin, and dynorphin B promote cardiogenesis in ES cells (6McBurney M.W. Jones-Villeneuve E.M. Edwards M.K. Anderson P.J. Nature. 1982; 299: 165-167Crossref PubMed Scopus (575) Google Scholar, 7Xu C. Police S. Rao N. Carpenter M.K. Circ. Res. 2002; 91: 501-508Crossref PubMed Scopus (781) Google Scholar, 8Choi S.C. Yoon J. Shim W.J. Ro Y.M. Lim D.S. Exp. Mol. Med. 2004; 36: 515-523Crossref PubMed Scopus (100) Google Scholar, 9Kanno S. Kim P.K. Sallam K. Lei J. Billiar T.R. Shears II, L.L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004; 101: 12277-12281Crossref PubMed Scopus (148) Google Scholar, 10Paquin J. Danalache B.A. Jankowski M. McCann S.M. Gutkowska J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002; 99: 9550-9555Crossref PubMed Scopus (205) Google Scholar, 11Ventura C. Maioli M. Circ. Res. 2000; 87: 189-194Crossref PubMed Scopus (84) Google Scholar, 12Wobus A.M. Kaomei G. Shan J. Wellner M.C. Rohwedel J. Ji G. Fleischmann B. Katus H.A. Hescheler J. Franz W.M. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 1997; 29: 1525-1539Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (358) Google Scholar, 13Takahashi T. Lord B. Schulze P.C. Fryer R.M. Sarang S.S. Gullans S.R. Lee R.T. Circulation. 2003; 107: 1912-1916Crossref PubMed Scopus (405) Google Scholar), but the mechanisms of induction by these factors have not been clarified. embryonic stem focal adhesion kinase myosin heavy chain green fluorescent protein enhanced GFP (+)-5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine FAK-related nonkinase neuronal cellular adhesion molecule platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 α-fetoprotein platelet-derived growth factor extracellular signal-regulated kinase Extracellular matrix proteins and their predominant cell surface receptors, the integrins, are known to transduce adhesion signals through kinases such as focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and the Src family tyrosine kinases (14Hynes R.O. Cell. 2002; 110: 673-687Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (6892) Google Scholar, 15Giancotti F.G. Ruoslahti E. Science. 1999; 285: 1028-1032Crossref PubMed Scopus (3821) Google Scholar, 16Aplin A.E. Howe A. Alahari S.K. Juliano R.L. Pharmacol. Rev. 1998; 50: 197-263PubMed Google Scholar, 17Ross R.S. Borg T.K. Circ. Res. 2001; 88: 1112-1119Crossref PubMed Scopus (359) Google Scholar, 18Dallabrida S.M. Ismail N. Oberle J.R. Himes B.E. Rupnick M.A. Circ. Res. 2005; 96: e8-24Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). These signaling pathways also participate in tissue regeneration (19Bock-Marquette I. Saxena A. White M.D. Dimaio J.M. Srivastava D. Nature. 2004; 432: 466-472Crossref PubMed Scopus (575) Google Scholar, 20Vinarsky V. Atkinson D.L. Stevenson T.J. Keating M.T. Odelberg S.J. Dev. Biol. 2005; 279: 86-98Crossref PubMed Scopus (161) Google Scholar) and stem cell differentiation. In the embryo, mesoendodermal development is disturbed in fibronectin, laminin γ1 chain, or α5 integrin knock-out mice (21George E.L. Georges-Labouesse E.N. Patel-King R.S. Rayburn H. Hynes R.O. Development. 1993; 119: 1079-1091Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 22Parsons M.J. Pollard S.M. Saude L. Feldman B. Coutinho P. Hirst E.M. Stemple D.L. Development. 2002; 129: 3137-3146PubMed Google Scholar, 23Goh K.L. Yang J.T. Hynes R.O. Development. 1997; 124: 4309-4319PubMed Google Scholar). Prudhomme et al. (24Prudhomme W. Daley G.Q. Zandstra P. Lauffenburger D.A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004; 101: 2900-2905Crossref PubMed Scopus (97) Google Scholar) reported that adhesion of mouse ES cells to fibronectin promotes initial differentiation, whereas adhesion to laminin enhances squamous epithelial cell differentiation in ES cells (25Takito J. Al-Awqati Q. J. Cell Biol. 2004; 166: 1093-1102Crossref PubMed Scopus (54) Google Scholar). Laminin 5 and α3β1 integrin signaling induce osteogenic gene expression in human mesenchymal stem cells (26Klees R.F. Salasznyk R.M. Kingsley K. Williams W.A. Boskey A. Plopper G.E. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2005; 16: 881-890Crossref PubMed Scopus (145) Google Scholar). However, the relationship between adhesion signaling and cardiac differentiation in ES cells is incompletely understood. Therefore, we explored adhesion signaling pathways, including Src and FAK, in the differentiation of mouse ES cells to cardiomyocytes. Here we report that embryoid body adhesion before the initiation of the cardiac differentiation program inhibits cardiogenesis. We explored signaling pathways downstream of including the Src tyrosine kinase We that of ES cells to PP2, a Src family kinase inhibitor, during embryoid body adhesion dramatically promotes cardiogenesis, as by in and cardiac expression and Surprisingly, we that the effect of PP2 was incompletely explained by Src kinase inhibition, and PP2 effect in by of adhesion-induced FAK In ES cells stably expressing FAK-related nonkinase, which functions as a dominant negative FAK, cell migration was inhibited, whereas cardiogenesis was These indicate that FAK signaling is a key negative regulator of cardiogenesis in mouse ES and FAK can promote cardiogenesis. and ES II, and the were from factor was from The was from The and luciferase were from and were from Science. The was from and to were from The mouse to cardiac and myosin were from the The to and were from Cell The to FAK and the of FAK were from and were from and were from and the mouse to were from was from the PP2, SU6656, and were from was from ES Cell and ES cells were on cells in with and were induce differentiation, cells were first and as hanging for embryoid body as T. Lord B. Schulze P.C. Fryer R.M. Sarang S.S. Gullans S.R. Lee R.T. Circulation. 2003; 107: 1912-1916Crossref PubMed Scopus (405) Google Scholar). with ES factor was and other embryoid body cells were on In cardiomyocytes within embryoid bodies were at and promoter-driven was and in T. Lord B. Schulze P.C. Fryer R.M. Sarang S.S. Gullans S.R. Lee R.T. Circulation. 2003; 107: 1912-1916Crossref PubMed Scopus (405) Google Scholar). the and were with and and the luciferase of and were to luciferase expression The of the was from with and and into the luciferase expression the expression the to of mouse was by from mouse The used were as to and The was into the with the and was by ES cells were with and for with as T. Lord B. Schulze P.C. Fryer R.M. Sarang S.S. Gullans S.R. Lee R.T. Circulation. 2003; 107: 1912-1916Crossref PubMed Scopus (405) Google Scholar). and was from ES cells with and of was with using the and the as T. Lord B. Schulze P.C. Fryer R.M. Sarang S.S. Gullans S.R. Lee R.T. Circulation. 2003; 107: 1912-1916Crossref PubMed Scopus (405) Google Scholar). of were as to and and and and and and and and and and and of Tbx5 and the is as for 4 and for for for by for a was by that the between the of and were within a and there were and for Tbx5 and respectively. bodies of cells were at day and luciferase were using the luciferase embryoid bodies were with with and with for cells were for with the to myosin and for with were with for and was as T. Lord B. Schulze P.C. Fryer R.M. Sarang S.S. Gullans S.R. Lee R.T. Circulation. 2003; 107: 1912-1916Crossref PubMed Scopus (405) Google Scholar). ES cells or embryoid bodies were with and with and the protein of cell were by were to in were with and with or and enhanced the to the of FAK was used as the cell were with protein and the of protein were with to FAK by with protein for were three with in and to Cell was as C. D.A. J. Biol. 2004; 279: Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). embryoid bodies were with and cells were on in differentiation for with or or Src cells were with for and cells were with and were with for cell embryoid bodies were on at day 4 and at day 4 or and the cell was Cell 4 embryoid bodies were on and in differentiation with or or Src for were on an on a were at and a of was used to of a were at for 4 to using a and on a for cell migration using cells were using a on the and cell were used to migration and for were as and by or of with with Cardiac in at to cardiac differentiation within embryoid bodies, mRNA expression of transcription factors was by bodies were to after hanging drop embryoid body a for differentiation of ES cells. an S. Nature. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), was expressed from 4 was expressed the transcription factors examined and increased after day The expression of and which have in cardiac development in the embryo D. E.N. Nature. 2000; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, M.J. Cardiovasc. Res. 2003; 58: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), after day by expression of the gene for the protein Nkx2.5 is known to within the embryonic I. S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1993; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, T.J. L. I. Development. 1993; 119: PubMed Google Scholar), and the gene expression in embryoid bodies was with the cardiac these data indicate that cardiac differentiation in embryoid bodies at day before the embryoid body adhesion before of Cardiac embryoid body adhesion cardiogenesis, promoter-driven cells were as embryoid bodies and on at and cardiomyocytes were at day The of cells was decreased embryoid bodies were at day 4 or was also by promoter-driven luciferase These data that signals downstream of embryoid body adhesion cardiogenesis. PP2 during tyrosine kinase and FAK are kinases downstream of integrin signaling F.G. Ruoslahti E. Science. 1999; 285: 1028-1032Crossref PubMed Scopus (3821) Google Scholar, 16Aplin A.E. Howe A. Alahari S.K. Juliano R.L. Pharmacol. Rev. 1998; 50: 197-263PubMed Google Scholar, 17Ross R.S. Borg T.K. Circ. Res. 2001; 88: 1112-1119Crossref PubMed Scopus (359) Google Scholar). Therefore, we examined of PP2, a known as an Src family kinase inhibitor, could promote cardiogenesis during embryoid body of PP2 from day 4 dramatically enhanced promoter-driven luciferase with embryoid bodies at day 4 and also with embryoid bodies at day not was the for PP2 to In PP2 from day and from before day PP2 inhibited cardiogenesis. protein of embryoid bodies was not by PP2 from day 4 not PP2 during promoter-driven cells and the of cells was cardiomyocyte PP2 cells and These were by of PP2 or to 5 and was of the Src family kinases was reported to for mouse and human ES cell and with a of retinoic to differentiation C. D.A. J. Biol. 2004; 279: Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the that PP2 promotes differentiation to other cell of and endodermal and α-fetoprotein mRNA expression was by and are of endothelial cells of mesoderm, and D.A. Dev. Biol. 2003; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, J. Wobus A. 2001; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). day expression was decreased and was whereas was not by PP2 These data that PP2 during embryoid body adhesion promotes cardiogenesis, by stem cell lineage commitment. PP2 FAK and Tbx5 mRNA PP2 is a Src family kinase inhibitor, we SU6656, another Src family kinase C. D.A. J. Biol. 2004; 279: Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, M.A. J. M. L. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), also enhances cardiogenesis in ES cells. 4 embryoid bodies were and adhesion-induced Src family kinase as tyrosine P. T. Nature. 2001; PubMed Scopus Google was by Src family kinases were to after adhesion in embryoid bodies with Me2SO, whereas were strongly inhibited by as well as PP2 Surprisingly, not promote cardiogenesis in embryoid bodies at was by of and cardiac that PP2 enhanced expression of these cardiac proteins we examined with the Src cardiogenesis in embryoid at a of Src in cells and inhibited mRNA expression with effect of was also in but not in both at the mRNA and the protein to by with although inhibits of Src to or Instead, PP2 FAK We of promotes cardiogenesis, but of the kinase with or not have an effect similar to PP2 not the cardiac gene expression in cells with Me2SO, PP2, or was by We that the gene expression of was to that of cardiac in expression by PP2 was from day and cardiac transcription factors Tbx5 was increased by PP2 from day 5 and as at day 5 and day to the in gene expression for other transcription factors and is Tbx5 is a transcription factor that is for cardiogenesis in the embryo G. L. S. D.A. M. M. Cell. 2001; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) and promotes cardiogenesis with Nkx2.5 in embryonic cells S. K. R. I. Nat. 2001; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). these that Src in cardiac differentiation, whereas the effect of PP2 is incompletely explained by Src inhibition, and that PP2 during embryoid body adhesion specifically Tbx5 mRNA expression to promote cardiogenesis. reported that PP2 inhibits of FAK H. R.S. J. J. J. Biol. 2004; 279: Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S.S. W. S.K. Circ. Res. 2003; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, V. L. Yang Lee S. J. 2004; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, Lee White J.M. R. R.M. J. Biol. 2003; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), the growth factor J. A. J. H. U. D. A. V. A. Circ. Res. 1999; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), J. A. J. H. U. D. A. V. A. Circ. Res. 1999; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), or L. R. A. J. Biol. 2003; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) in cell Therefore, we examined PP2 specifically inhibits adhesion-induced FAK and phosphorylation. FAK was by PP2 but not by SU6656, whereas not between PP2 and cell migration of the embryoid body for after adhesion was strongly inhibited in embryoid bodies with PP2 with that FAK a in cell migration J.M. K. J.T. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, H.A. J.M. P.J. K.R. M.C. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2003; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S.K. D.A. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S.K. D. 2004; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). is also that cellular to could the of the cell to These data indicate that PP2 specifically inhibits adhesion-induced FAK and that FAK may the by which PP2 cardiogenesis in embryoid of Cell and Cardiogenesis in the effect of FAK on cardiogenesis, ES cells stably expressing FAK-related nonkinase or GFP were and for cardiogenesis. is the FAK that functions as a of FAK signaling S.K. D. 2004; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, A. T. Nature. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) and inhibits FAK in cell such as D.A. D.A. J. 2002; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), cells J.M. K. J.T. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, J.M. J. Biol. 2003; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), and neonatal cardiomyocytes M.C. A.M. Circ. Res. 2002; 1282-1289Crossref PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). day embryoid bodies from ES cells expression In embryoid bodies, adhesion-induced FAK was inhibited, and Src was also with that an interaction between FAK and Src in that mRNA expression was increased in embryoid bodies but strongly decreased in embryoid bodies adhesion-induced FAK was strongly in these embryoid bodies with in Tbx5 expression were not in using ES cells stably expressing day embryoid bodies were with myosin the of cardiomyocytes was increased in embryoid bodies as well as embryoid bodies with the procardiogenic effect of in ES cells FAK can cell and we explored FAK cell and cell migration in ES cells. In cells from day 5 embryoid bodies, the of cells was decreased with PP2 as well as In the of was increased, whereas the cell were decreased with both at day 4 and 5 the other by cell migration was decreased both in and but not in or cells These data indicate that FAK cell migration and promotes cardiogenesis in embryoid In the we promoter-driven or luciferase as for cardiac differentiation from embryoid bodies of mouse ES cells. We first that embryoid body adhesion before the initiation of inhibits cardiogenesis and that of PP2, a known as an Src family kinase inhibitor, during embryoid body adhesion promotes cardiogenesis. we that effect of PP2 by Src kinase the procardiogenic effect is at to of adhesion-induced FAK In embryoid bodies, transcription factors and mRNA to after the induction by the that the of ES cell differentiation to cardiomyocytes that of cardiogenesis in the embryoid body adhesion before expression of these transcription cardiogenesis was strongly inhibited, suggesting that signals with the initial cardiac differentiation we the of integrin signaling on cardiogenesis, we that PP2, an of Src kinase that is an downstream kinase in integrin dramatically promotes cardiogenesis in ES cells. PP2 not induce or cell within embryoid bodies, since protein not The effect of PP2 was not in ES cell embryoid body ES cell can transcription factor expression and induce endoderm differentiation T. M. S. N. J. Cell Sci. 2004; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar), suggesting that PP2 after the initial germ of ES cells. PP2 enhanced cardiogenesis in embryoid bodies, whereas differentiation to cell of and endodermal was strongly inhibited, that PP2 may stem cell lineage commitment. PP2 may direct cells cardiac promote of cardiac which was specifically increased with PP2, can of embryonic cardiomyocytes Kim B. T. Dev. Biol. 2001; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). is also that PP2 not cardiogenesis after day and expression in embryoid bodies, stem cells have been to cardiac cardiomyocytes with PP2 expressed of cardiac contractile proteins, such as myosin heavy chain and cardiac and with cells suggesting that PP2 may not cardiac differentiation but also cardiomyocyte could explained by an in which including T.K. S.J. L. S. A.M. G. A. D. Nat. 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) and G. L. S. D.A. M. M. Cell. 2001; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). with Src and to of cardiogenesis in ES and Src was by expression of These indicate that there is an interaction between Src and FAK in cardiogenesis in the other PP2 not induce the although the of Src kinase by PP2 is R. S. E. A. O. A. 2003; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). another Src family kinase failed to the effect of PP2 and also failed to the effect of Src used not to the of Src family the effect of PP2 to incompletely explained by Src that in with FAK can not with Src but with other kinases, such as and small B. A. R. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, E. J. Biol. 2004; 279: Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S. R. L. E. J. Biol. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (97) Google Scholar, H. M.J. J. Biol. 2004; 279: Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). PP2 been reported to of FAK and tyrosine kinases such as growth factor or in neonatal and cell FAK is a key in integrin and tyrosine kinase signaling D. E. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). We that PP2 specifically inhibits adhesion-induced FAK, but not in ES cells. is a of FAK and is known to expressed in cells of and J.M. K. J.T. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). In the of to increased mRNA expression and cells in embryoid However, we the that PP2 inhibited another as well as In adhesion at and and expression of GFP to FAK in embryoid bodies, with of cardiogenesis. These indicate that FAK inhibits cardiogenesis. was reported that FAK is not for differentiation of mouse ES cells D. T. T. J. T. S. Res. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). These of in differentiation in FAK knock-out ES and embryoid bodies were to which is the cardiogenesis in In mRNA or protein expression was not in their of FAK can to in cell or and is possible that cellular to or to in to cell commitment. et al. Lee White J.M. R. R.M. J. Biol. 2003; Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) reported that PP2 differentiation by of adhesion-induced FAK phosphorylation. In cell migration was inhibited both in cells and that of cell but not cell may promote cardiogenesis in ES cells. FAK effect by of of the downstream of FAK, since signaling is reported to mouse ES cell H. M.J. J. Biol. 2004; 279: Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) as well as initial cardiac differentiation of mouse embryonic cells by signaling H. H. T. T. H. I. Circ. Res. 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). although their model of embryonic cells was from embryoid body that of signaling after day 4 inhibited differentiation into as we in the of FAK These could to of cardiomyocytes from ES cells and that FAK signaling could promote cardiogenesis of stem cells. to cardiomyocyte by PP2, downstream of FAK, and the mechanisms of the initial embryoid body may The mouse to cardiac and myosin by S. J. J. J. and D. A. were from the the of the of and by the of of with
Hakuno et al. (Tue,) studied this question.