The 3D-HARP method for tracking 3-D cardiac motion correlated strongly with established techniques for circumferential strain (r2=0.8605) and twist angle (r2=0.8645), requiring about 10 minutes.
Effect estimate: r2 = 0.8605 (strain), r2 = 0.8645 (twist)
Magnetic resonance (MR) tagging is capable of accurate, noninvasive quantification of regional myocardial function. Routine clinical use, however, is hindered by cumbersome and time-consuming postprocessing procedures. We propose a fast, semiautomatic method for tracking three-dimensional (3-D) cardiac motion from a temporal sequence of short- and long-axis tagged MR images. The new method, called 3-D-HARmonic Phase (3D-HARP), extends the HARP approach, previously described for two-dimensional (2-D) tag analysis, to 3-D. A 3-D material mesh model is built to represent a collection of material points inside the left ventricle (LV) wall at a reference time. Harmonic phase, a material property that is time-invariant, is used to track the motion of the mesh through a cardiac cycle. Various motion-related functional properties of the myocardium, such as circumferential strain and left ventricular twist, are computed from the tracked mesh. The correlation analysis of 3D-HARP and FINDTAGS + Tag Strain(E) Analysis (TEA), which are well-established tag analysis techniques, shows that the regression coefficients of circumferential strain (E(CC)) and twist angle are r2 = 0.8605 and r2 = 0.8645, respectively. The total time required for tracking 3-D cardiac motion is approximately 10 min in a 9 timeframe tagged MRI dataset and has the potential to be much faster.
Pan et al. (Wed,) conducted a other in Cardiac motion tracking. 3D-HARP vs. FINDTAGS + Tag Strain(E) Analysis (TEA) was evaluated on Correlation of circumferential strain (E(CC)) and twist angle (r2 = 0.8605 (strain), r2 = 0.8645 (twist)). The 3D-HARP method for tracking 3-D cardiac motion correlated strongly with established techniques for circumferential strain (r2=0.8605) and twist angle (r2=0.8645), requiring about 10 minutes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: