Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Sport-event tourism has evolved into a force of considerable economic and cultural importance, shaping destination identities and generating substantial global visitor flows (Gibson, 1998;Higham Müller, 2015). These challenges have intensified pressure on event organizers, host governments, and national tourism boards to demonstrate broader social and cultural value.Creative tourism has emerged as a promising but underutilized response to these challenges. Defined in this article as a form of tourism in which visitors participate in active learning experiences, artistic practices, and authentic cultural engagement that connect them with local communities and creative processes (Richards Richards, 2011), creative tourism prioritizes cocreation-understood here as the collaborative production of tourism experiences through the active participation of both visitors and host communities (Rihova et al., 2015)-as a mechanism for generating authentic, inclusive, and economically diversified destination experiences. The emergence of creative tourism has been further supported by international recognition of the creative economy's role in sustainable development (UNESCO, 2013;UNCTAD, 2018).Despite the apparent complementarity of these fields, their intersection remains surprisingly understudied. A scoping search conducted across Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar using the search strings 'sport tourism AND creative tourism,' 'event tourism AND creative placemaking,' and 'sport events AND co-creation' identified fewer than 15 peer-reviewed articles directly addressing their intersection. This empirical gap justifies the present integrative review at this moment in the field's development: sport-event tourism has reached a scale at which its social and cultural consequences are impossible to ignore, while creative tourism has accumulated sufficient theoretical and practical maturity to offer actionable integration pathways. A framework that bridges these fields is both timely and necessary.Two concepts are foundational to this article. Creative placemaking refers to the strategic integration of arts and cultural activities into the physical and social fabric of a community to foster civic engagement, cultural vitality, and a distinctive sense of place (Markusen Snyder, 2019), which is particularly appropriate for emerging research areas where integration of disparate literatures can generate new theoretical perspectives. A systematic search was conducted across Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for publications from 2000 to 2024. Search terms included combinations of 'sport tourism,' 'event tourism,' 'creative tourism,' 'creative placemaking,' 'event leveraging,' 'co-creation,' and 'destination value.' Inclusion criteria required: (a) peer-reviewed articles or scholarly book chapters; (b) direct relevance to at least one of the five thematic clusters described below; and (c) availability in English. Grey literature (reports from UNESCO, UNCTAD, and the IOC) was included where directly relevant to the framework's empirical grounding.Approximately 40 sources were identified, reviewed, and synthesized.The literature was organized into five thematic clusters following Torraco's (2005) guidance on integrative review structure: (1) impacts and leverage of sport-event tourism; (2) theories of creative tourism; (3) creative placemaking; (4) social sustainability in tourism; and (5) co-creation in tourism experiences. The CSETN framework was developed through an iterative process of inductive synthesis and deductive reasoning: first, key theoretical models were mapped across the five clusters; second, points of convergence and complementarity were identified; third, integration mechanisms were inductively derived from documented empirical precedents and theoretical propositions; and fourth, the framework components were refined through iterative comparison with the case evidence.As an opinion piece, this article prioritizes conceptual novelty and synthetic contribution over comprehensive systematic coverage (Grant Smith, 2014). Operationally, event leveraging involves the strategic deployment of complementary activities-such as cultural programming, business networking, and community engagement-that use the event as a catalyst rather than treating it as a self-contained product. This creates explicit conceptual space for creative interventions as strategic leverage tools, providing the CSETN's primary rationale for integrating creative placemaking within sport-event tourism planning.The relevance of this framework is reinforced by the extensively documented 'mega-event syndrome,' characterized by cost overruns, community displacement, and exclusion from planning processes (Müller, 2015;Smith, 2012), which has generated sustained calls for participatory and leverage-oriented approaches that distribute benefits more equitably.The Creative Tourism Framework Richards (2011) synthesizes the Creative Tourism Framework from earlier definitional work by Richards and Raymond (2000) and subsequent empirical studies across European and Asian contexts. The framework rests on three interlocking components. First, the content dimension identifies the specific creative domains through which tourist engagement occurs, including crafts, performing arts, culinary arts, digital media, and heritage interpretation. Second, the process dimension distinguishes passive creative consumption (attending a performance) from active creative participation (co-producing a craft object or contributing to a community mural), with higher levels of participation associated with deeper experience quality and stronger place attachment. Third, the context dimension recognizes that creative tourism is fundamentally embedded in place: the authenticity and meaning of creative experiences derive from their rootedness in specific communities, traditions, and physical environments. Applied to the CSETN, these three dimensions map directly onto the framework's six integration mechanisms: creative fan experiences and digital co-creation engage the content and process dimensions; artisan activations and co-designed event spaces engage the context dimension; cultural side-festivals and immersive storytelling engage all three simultaneously.Pine and Gilmore's (1999) Experience Economy framework posits that advanced economies increasingly compete on the basis of staged experiences rather than goods or services. Four realms of experience are identified-entertainment, educational, aesthetic, and escapist-distinguished by the degree of active participation (passive to active) and environmental immersion (absorption to immersion). The framework has been applied extensively in tourism contexts to explain value creation through experience staging. Within the CSETN, the Experience Economy provides the commercial rationale for creative integration: experiential differentiation increases visitor willingness to pay, extends dwell time, and enhances destination competitiveness.However, a theoretical tension warrants explicit acknowledgment. The Experience Economy is fundamentally market-driven, framing experience as a staged commercial offering designed for and sold to consumers. Creative placemaking (Markusen Ap, 1992) provides the micro-level foundation for understanding community-visitor relationships within creative interventions. SET posits that individuals and groups engage in social exchanges when perceived benefits are seen to outweigh costs.Applied to the CSETN, this explains why residents may actively support or resist creative programming associated with sport events. When communities perceive tangible benefits-income from artisan markets, cultural recognition through co-designed event spaces, pride generated by heritage storytelling installations-they are more likely to participate in and sustain creative initiatives. Conversely, where benefits accrue primarily to external operators rather than local residents, disengagement and resistance are predictable outcomes. SET thus provides the motivational logic underpinning the CSETN's emphasis on inclusive co-design and equitable benefit-sharing, and it connects directly to the social inclusion outcome pathway of the framework.These four theoretical frameworks are not independent pillars but interconnected contributors to the CSETN's explanatory architecture. The Event Leverage Framework (Chalip, 2006) establishes why creative interventions are strategically valuable within sport-event tourism planning. The Creative Tourism Framework (Richards, 2011) specifies what forms creative tourism takes and how visitor engagement deepens across content, process, and context dimensions. The Experience Economy (Pine additional sport-event tourism and creative tourism studies cited in the text provide broader theoretical grounding.The CSETN framework was constructed through the iterative synthesis process described in the methodology section, drawing directly on the intersectional literature synthesized in Table 1. In the inductive phase, recurring themes across the identified studies were mapped: the potential for sport events to activate creative economy supply chains; the role of community co-design in generating authentic place identity; and the governance conditions required for creative legacies to persist beyond the event period. In the deductive phase, these inductive themes were structured using the four theoretical frameworks described above-Event Leverage, Creative Tourism, Experience Economy, and Social Exchange Theory-to identify which mechanisms correspond to which theoretical logic.The six nexus mechanisms emerged from this dual process: each mechanism has both an empirical precedent in the intersectional literature (Table 1) and a theoretical grounding in one or more of the four frameworks. The dual outcome pathways-enhanced destination value and improved social inclusion-were derived deductively from the framework's theoretical architecture: destination value maps primarily to the Experience Economy and Event Leverage logics, while social inclusion maps to Social Exchange Theory and the Creative Tourism Framework's context dimension.The Creative Sport-Event Tourism Nexus comprises five interconnected components (Figure 1): (1) sport-event tourism inputs-visitor concentration, media reach, and capital investment generated by the event; (2) creative tourism inputs-local creative assets, community participation capacity, and established cultural programming traditions; (3) the nexus domain where these converge through six integration mechanisms; (4) dual outcome pathways-enhanced destination value and addressed social inclusion challenges; and (5) moderating factors that shape the conditions under which mechanisms generate positive outcomes.The five components operate in a bidirectional and iterative rather than strictly sequential manner. Sport-event inputs and creative tourism inputs feed simultaneously into the nexus domain; the resulting outcomes, in turn, generate feedback that reshapes subsequent inputs through learning, reputation-building, and community capacity development. This cyclical dynamic is consistent with Chalip's (2006) leverage framework, in which leveraging activities require ongoing refinement across event cycles.Source: Authors' own elaboration based on Richards (2011), Chalip (2006), Markusen and Gadwa (2010), Pine and Gilmore (1999), and Duxbury and Richards (2019).The six nexus mechanisms are differentiated below according to their level of empirical grounding: Established Practice (supported by multiple studies with consistent empirical evidence), Emerging Evidence (supported by one to three studies or documented outcomes), and Theoretical Proposal (conceptually grounded but lacking direct empirical support to date).(a) Creative fan experiences engage as through and collaborative precedents community and digital at the and where participatory creative activations visitor engagement beyond the 2014). this mechanism with Pine and Gilmore's (1999) and experience which require active side-festivals the through programming such as arts and heritage The over events across four contributing to a in international and This mechanism has the empirical of the with consistent from and event contexts activations local creative to the sport-event tourist market through craft and participatory The associated with a for over local to the event visitor contributing to creative economy & Richards and provide broader for artisan as a mechanism for visitor within local supply co-designed event spaces with engage residents and in the and of fan and participatory design approaches have potential to community of spaces and social to event-related development & 2011), systematic empirical from sport-event contexts remains this mechanism as a theoretical supported by conceptual precedent rather than a tested Evidence levels Established Practice multiple studies with consistent empirical Emerging Evidence one to three empirical studies or documented Theoretical Proposal grounded but lacking direct empirical support to moderating factors shape the conditions under which nexus mechanisms generate positive engagement, as the of local residents and community actively in co-design determines the authenticity and of creative interventions. on participatory governance literature & 2011), a of local in planning processes is as an for this is as a practical for and rather than a and its empirical warrants in by the or of creative economy and event planning within the host the and conditions for sustained as and availability of at event determines the of mechanisms such as immersive storytelling and digital creative capacity, as the of creative and the of established arts and cultural determines whether sufficient local supply to artisan markets, co-design and cultural Event through visitor reach, and event determines both the for creative programming and the to which commercial may CSETN not operate across all and its conditions is for The placemaking activities associated with sport events can value the communities cultural assets the creative programming.This dynamic has been documented in host where artistic and cultural of of residents A is the of local when creative interventions are designed primarily to the experiential of sport authentic cultural may be to a that meaning for resident communities over broader is that sustainability and are frequently positive Evidence from sustainability research across five host recurring of cost on local and post-event where sustainability were substantial et al., Creative post-event governance creative risks 'event rather than a foundation for conditions the of First, where event organizers primary of creative programming community commercial to Second, where host or community creative risks are Third, where the event is a rather than an embedded recurring are likely to sustainable community the CSETN are to community impact assessments to creative interventions and to with local creative rationale for integrating creative tourism with sport-event tourism in the creative economy is the with a of in and sport events provide a with visitor and media increasingly participation rather than passive (Rihova et al., et al., of impacts for approaches that local distribution (Müller, 2015). digital and immersive media experiences at event scale et al., empirical are below to CSETN across event host and outcome Table provides a structured each case is and and The extensively documented of creative programming within a sport over across events over four and an investment directly to into one of tourism The case CSETN under a diverse host with established creative a that planning with and substantial investment that sustained creative programming and the The in international and be to creative and European all establishes cultural programming as a contributing to destination the case the of in including that positive destination value and social inclusion can and community The over cultural and in cultural programming across the The with CSETN's artisan and cultural over local with to the event visitor market & the case the of two moderating event scale and community creative a host with a creative in creative into placemaking outcomes. below within two and creative were within three of the & These on sustainability where frequently to into post-event frameworks et al., that CSETN mechanisms require post-event governance frameworks to generate The conducted in a context that physical demonstrate the CSETN's digital co-creation mechanism under but The digital cultural reached global through digital collaborative and cultural engagement that digital mechanisms can creative event participation beyond the physical host The case an dimension to the CSETN by that digital the of mechanisms: host with digital can activate digital co-creation as primary rather than for physical creative programming of the CSETN to contexts warrants specific and the of and sport in events such as the in have the potential for associated cultural programming to local creative the conditions in contexts from in host and require are the creative artisan market co-designed be for host with event and In CSETN is more through mechanisms: cultural artisan market activations in spaces, and digital that leverage rather than present a host frequently the event planning creative economy and mechanisms that the CSETN's identifies as in and community creative development or creative programming rather than capacity is for This on sustainability in host where the to which into sustainability et al., risks a third specific to are and social are the documented in host may be more mechanisms and co-designed event CSETN components with the be in the empirical foundation of the six community impact assessments and with local creative are particularly in these the community creative capacity takes on in creative may be or and cultural may be embedded in community rather than CSETN in contexts creative economy as and design mechanisms that are to and community cultural rather than on creative to CSETN integration not be event cultural and tourism event planning participatory co-design processes that require sustained community engagement over or event and community measurement frameworks that economic over social or cultural creative programming to within event reporting structures et al., 2016). these requires treating the sport event not as a economic but as a catalyst for creative destination following five research are by from to and composite measurement indicators case studies across diverse event community sport and contexts provide the empirical grounding from the to and the engagement in the moderating factors events that community programming and that on event host and visitor the potential of CSETN of creative programming across event is to creative contribution to post-event communities and creative across a of five research with marginalized communities The involves participatory research to co-design inclusive creative interventions with groups at of or This requires sustained community engagement, and that beyond organizers for community-led creative of at least of event to creative initiatives. processes require documented of community co-design Event a creative how creative and community capacity the event be sustained beyond event co-design local and community in the of event fan and cultural community impact assessments be for events a visitor with into event mechanisms event cultural and planning to the that CSETN tourism boards social impact key indicators for creative tourism, including cultural participation host community residents, of creative economy by local resident satisfaction with creative programming, and post-event creative These be into national event and economic impact in post-event tourism at a creative The CSETN framework in this article identifies six specific integration in four complementary theoretical frameworks and synthesized from the intersectional which creative tourism concepts can be deployed within sport-event tourism contexts to destination value and social inclusion First, the empirical grounding of the six mechanisms is cultural side-festivals and artisan activations on an established empirical while community co-designed event spaces and theoretical empirical This is for prioritizing mechanism and for the empirical Second, moderating community creative capacity and post-event governance CSETN mechanisms be to generate positive of Third, the framework's in contexts requires and supported rather than direct of models from host theoretical tension experience and placemaking is not by the CSETN but is productively as a governance design that creative placemaking as a foundation for community than as an event deliberate and post-event mechanisms that at the of event planning.The creative economy the and sport-event tourism provides the the and the The is to creative placemaking not as an but as a foundational in the delivery, and of sport-event tourism in the
Khalimova et al. (Tue,) studied this question.