In patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, baseline left ventricular sphericity index was the sole independent predictor of reverse remodeling and associated mitral regurgitation improvement (OR 0.76).
Observational (n=188)
No
What baseline echocardiographic parameters predict reverse remodeling and improvement of functional mitral regurgitation in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Baseline left ventricular sphericity index is a significant predictor of reverse remodeling and improvement in functional mitral regurgitation in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.
Effect estimate: OR 0.76 (95% CI 0.58-0.99)
p-value: p=0.04
BACKGROUND: Functional mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common finding in dilated cardiomyopathy. Left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling with LV size reduction and improvement in LV function is a well recognized phenomenon. We aimed to evaluate the impact of LV remodeling on the mechanism leading to functional MR. METHODS: Among 188 patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, 10 patients significantly improved their LV function, reduced LV size and MR severity during follow-up (RRMR). A comparison was made between their baseline and follow-up echocardiographic examinations and to a matched-control group of patients who did not improve (no RRMR). LV and left atrium (LA) dimensions and volumes, LV mass (LVM), LV ejection fraction (LVEF) (Simpsons), sphericity index (SI), mitral valve tenting area (TA) coaptation distance (CD), effective regurgitant orifice (ERO), and regurgitant volume were calculated. Multivariable analysis was performed in order to evaluate which echocardiographic parameters related to MR improvement in reverse remodeling. RESULTS: LV and LA dimensions and volumes, LVM, SI, TA, CD, ERO and right ventricle, in the RRMR group significantly decreased at follow-up (p < 0.04 for all). When compared to no RRMR, despite a similar ERO (0.2 ± 0.05 vs. 0.2 ± 0.08, p = 0.13) and a larger regurgitant volume (38 ± 9 vs. 29 ± 8 mL, p = 0.05) and despite similar clinical characteristics and medical treatment we found significantly higher LVEF, smaller LV dimensions and volumes, smaller LVM and SI in the RRMR group (p < 0.05 for all). On multivariable analysis the SI was the sole predictor of RRMR (p = 0.04, OR = 0.76, CI 0.58-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Reverse remodeling characterized by improvement in LV function, reduction in LV size and an associated reduction in MR severity is related to LV SI at baseline.
Kuperstein et al. (Wed,) conducted a observational in Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy with functional mitral regurgitation (n=188). Left ventricular reverse remodeling (RRMR) vs. No reverse remodeling (no RRMR) was evaluated on Predictor of reverse remodeling with mitral regurgitation improvement (RRMR) (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.58-0.99, p=0.04). In patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, baseline left ventricular sphericity index was the sole independent predictor of reverse remodeling and associated mitral regurgitation improvement (OR 0.76).