Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
PURPOSE: Patients undergoing outpatient radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiation (CRT) frequently require acute care (emergency department evaluation or hospitalization). Machine learning (ML) may guide interventions to reduce this risk. There are limited prospective studies investigating the clinical impact of ML in health care. The objective of this study was to determine whether ML can identify high-risk patients and direct mandatory twice-weekly clinical evaluation to reduce acute care visits during treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During this single-institution randomized quality improvement study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04277650), 963 outpatient adult courses of RT and CRT started from January 7 to June 30, 2019, were evaluated by an ML algorithm. Among these, 311 courses identified by ML as high risk (> 10% risk of acute care during treatment) were randomized to standard once-weekly clinical evaluation (n = 157) or mandatory twice-weekly evaluation (n = 154). Both arms allowed additional evaluations on the basis of clinician discretion. The primary end point was the rate of acute care visits during RT. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) and decile calibration plots. RESULTS: = .02). Low-risk patients had a 2.7% acute care rate. Model discrimination was good in high- and low-risk patients undergoing standard once-weekly evaluation (AUC, 0.851). CONCLUSION: In this prospective randomized study, ML accurately triaged patients undergoing RT and CRT, directing clinical management with reduced acute care rates versus standard of care. This prospective study demonstrates the potential benefit of ML in health care and offers opportunities to enhance care quality and reduce health care costs.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Julian C. Hong
Cancer Research Institute
Neville Eclov
Allina Health
Nicole Dalal
Stanford University
Journal of Clinical Oncology
University of California, San Francisco
Duke University
Duke Medical Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hong et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0face14fb650da4ffe6262 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.20.01688
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: