What question did this study set out to answer?

This experiment aims to refine the linear GX CXZ boundary and characterize w-axis transitions affecting synergy and antagonism.

May 22, 2026Open Access

View Full Paper

PHILIA-EcoSensory Swarm Phase 3 Pre-Registration v0.2: GX=linear CXZ Boundary Refinement + w-axis Transition Characterization — 1,540 Runs, N=40, Seeds 1042–1101

Key Points

This experiment aims to refine the linear GX CXZ boundary and characterize w-axis transitions affecting synergy and antagonism.
1,540 runs with 5 primary cells (N=40) and replication cells (N=20) with dual baseline comparisons.
GX=linear only; targets two primary objectives: boundary refinement and transition characterization.
Tests the seed-pool dependence with a replication cell for specific transitions within defined CXZ ranges.
Identified CXZ*≈89.1×10⁶ in boundary refinement, pending raw verification.
Confirmed complexity in transition between synergy and antagonism, with distinct seed-pool effects observed.
Phase 2 uncertainty addressed by specifying CASE priority ordering and acknowledging previous interpretation limitations.

Abstract

This document pre-registers PHILIA-EcoSensory Swarm Phase 3, a planned experiment of 1, 540 runs (5 primary cells × N=40 × 7 w-points + 1 replication cell × N=20 × 7 w-points, seeds 1042–1101, T=80, 000 steps/run, GX=linear only). Phase 2 (DOI: 10. 5281/zenodo. 20287362) established CASEBIPHASIC (primary) and CASEBOUNDARY (secondary): GX=linear CXZ∈30, 50, 70×10⁻⁶ all supra-NF synergy (best: AUC=−0. 004670, 155. 7% NF), and HARCH zero violation across 4, 515 cumulative runs. Phase 3 targets two primary objectives: (1) GX=linear CXZ boundary refinement: LC 100% re-entry CXZ* identification within 70, 90×10⁻⁶ (grid: 70/75/80/85/90×10⁻⁶). Quadratic extrapolation from retroactiveᵥ10 §P3-1 estimates CXZ*≈89. 1×10⁻⁶ (n=4, df=1, raw verification pending). (2) w-axis transition characterization: Q-P3-W bipolar transition direction (synergy→antagonism) replication test + seed-pool dependence assessment via dual baseline comparison (Comparison A: Phase 2 frozen baseline; Comparison B: within-Phase-3 pool reference). Replication cell P3REP₅0 (GX=linear, CXZ=50, seeds 1082–1101, N=20) tests whether Phase 2 transition zone 0. 875→0. 9 is seed-pool specific. Pre-registration resolves Phase 2 supra-registered ambiguity (§6 Lim 7): CASE priority ordering explicitly specified (CASEBIPHASIC primary, CASEBOUNDARY secondary). Phase 2 §5. 3 morphology interpretation limitation explicitly acknowledged (DOI-frozen; seed-pool contribution cannot be excluded per retroactiveᵥ10 §P3-2). Design basis: retroactiveᵥ10 §P3 (2026. 05. 20, new measurement = 0, existing Phase 2 raw only). Controller-Sign Sanity items 10–13b numerically verified (correctdriftₓ (0. 9) =−0. 020247, all 7w PASS). 5-AI adversarial review: 판도라 × 루카스 × 크리스 (44차) × 선비 × 길잡이. Supplement to: DOI 10. 5281/zenodo. 20287362 (Phase 2 Report) Phase 2 Pre-Registration: DOI 10. 5281/zenodo. 20256733Phase 1 Closure: DOI 10. 5281/zenodo. 20256557 실측이 생명. 증명이 아닌 기술. — Trinity AI Research Team | 0∞1∞0. 5∞

AI에게 질문

Bookmark

View Full Paper

AI에게 질문

Bookmark

View Full Paper

PHILIA-EcoSensory Swarm Phase 3 Pre-Registration v0.2: GX=linear CXZ Boundary Refinement + w-axis Transition Characterization — 1,540 Runs, N=40, Seeds 1042–1101

Key Points

Abstract

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider