PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 5, 2003594 citations

Comparative effectiveness of augmented reality in object assembly

View Full Paper
ATArthur TangCOCharles B. OwenFBFrank Biocca

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Although there has been much speculation about the potential of Augmented Reality (AR), there are very few empirical studies about its effectiveness. This paper describes an experiment that tested the relative effectiveness of AR instructions in an assembly task. Task information was displayed in user's field of view and registered with the workspace as 3D objects to explicitly demonstrate the exact execution of a procedure step. Three instructional media were compared with the AR system: a printed manual, computer assisted instruction (CAI) using a monitor-based display, and CAI utilizing a head-mounted display. Results indicate that overlaying 3D instructions on the actual work pieces reduced the error rate for an assembly task by 82%, particularly diminishing cumulative errors - errors due to previous assembly mistakes. Measurement of mental effort indicated decreased mental effort in the AR condition, suggesting some of the mental calculation of the assembly task is offloaded to the system.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tang et al. (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a108bcad13714ec96000496https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642626
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper