Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Physical manufacturing and research infrastructures are essential for advanced innovation but often remain inaccessible to SMEs, start-ups, and research institutions that cannot justify ownership of capital-intensive assets. This study examines whether platform-mediated infrastructure sharing can function as a sustainable open-innovation mechanism in advanced manufacturing. Using the SCIP/SYNPRO platform developed in the SYNERGY and IDEATION projects, an exploratory case-study design combines descriptive analysis of a registry of 290 infrastructure items across 11 countries with qualitative analysis of 23 documented access requests, interaction records, and pilot reports. The results show that the Provider–Taker model facilitates observable access-enabling interactions, including infrastructure publication, request submission, provider–taker communication, negotiation, and selected documented use, although it does not measure population-wide access outcomes. Sharing potential is uneven: modular and emerging technologies, especially VR/AR infrastructures, attract higher request intensity than production-integrated assets. Users and providers favour negotiated access, flexible pricing, operator support, and contractual clarification rather than standardised rental models. Qualitative evidence shows that value is created through access to otherwise unavailable equipment, postponed investment, experimentation, technology familiarisation, student training, capability development, and new inter-organisational research links. The findings indicate that infrastructure sharing can support more resource-efficient innovation but depends on discoverability, governance, trust, and support mechanisms to scale.
Cholewa et al. (Thu,) studied this question.