Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Using a sample of international hospitality firms from 2015 to 2021, we investigate the relationship between ownership structure and innovation. We define innovative firms based on Miles and Snow's (1978) typology and use entropy balancing estimates to mitigate endogeneity concerns. We find that ownership concentration is negatively associated with innovation. Moreover, institutional investors are negatively associated with innovation, especially in innovation-friendly countries. In contrast, family investors are associated with higher innovation. We explain these results through the lens of socioemotional wealth and agency theory, as publicly traded companies are under pressure to deliver short-term returns, which is mitigated by the presence of a family with a longer-term approach. Thus, managers of hospitality companies need to be aware of the preferences of their shareholders in terms of innovation. • We study how ownership impacts innovation in worldwide hospitality firms. • Institutional investors are negatively associated with innovation. • Family investors are strongly associated with innovation. • The results depend on each country’s innovation index. • We explain the results through the lens of socio-emotional wealth and agency theory.
Poretti et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: