Modern and Ancient Continental Shelf Anoxia

Drs. R. V. Tyson and T. H. Pearson convened a symposium on modern and ancient shelf anoxia in May, 1989 under the aegis of the Gologica] Society Marine Studies Group. This volume is the product of that meeting. The meeting was multidisciplinary including geologists, biologists and chemists. The examination and interpretation of anoxic sedimentary environments is of significance in our understanding of the interplay of organic production, water circulation and sediment accumulation. When the flux of degradable organic material exceeds the oxygen supply, then anoxia and the exclusion of macrobenthos removes the more common bioturbation effects preserving primary depositional structures. It has also been postulated that the anoxic environment permits preservation of a larger proportion of the incoming organic matter. Studies in a variety of modern environments has tended to argue against that hypothesis although certainly the role of sulfate reducing bacteria versus aerobic bacterial processes is a major factor in the ultimate sedimentary product. Within the broad spectrum of anoxic environments, shelf anoxia is a special case. One complicating factor for the stratigrapher is that the anoxic condition in several shelf environments discussed in these papers is temporary and ephemeral. Thus a primary question is what artifacts of these periods of low or zero oxygen will remain in the sedimentary record? As the convenors point out in their opening review, the modern effects impact fisheries and with the overprinting of anthropogenic effects produce some complex questions for the marine biologist. They also aver that much of the hydrocarbon-rich sedimentary resources were laid down and developed in organic-rich and oxygen-depleted depositional environments. As noted earlier, the sometimes higher organic content of such sediments reflects the common association of high productivity regions (upwelling regions) with oxygen-deficient depositional environments. Even if degradation and removal rates are similar for all depositional environments, certainly the net input under high production areas will be larger. Major factors influencing oxygendeficiency in shelf regions are the higher biological production in margins as compared to open ocean, the short fall path in margins compared to open oceans and resulting higher sediment input rates, higher sediment accumulation rates and thus thicker mass accumulation and higher burial rates for carbon. Bioturbation is also operating at higher rates, and fluctuations in depositional regime are larger and faster. The editors also introduce a suggested standard terminology for such environments in which the environmental facies are termed oxic, dysoxic (with subdivisions), suboxic and anoxic with respective bottom water oxygen contents of > 2.0 ml/L, 0.2-2.0 ml/L, 0-0.2 ml/L and <0.0 ml/L (increasing dissolved H2S). Biofacies terms for these are respectively aerobic, dysaerobic, quasi-anaerobic and anaerobic at the same oxygen boundaries. Physiological regimes would be Normoxic, Hypoxic (no matching term for Suboxic) and anoxic respectively. The volume is subdivided into modern shelf anoxia studies, and ancient shelf anoxia studies. The papers in the two sections number 11 and 16 respectively and space does not permit review of each paper. The modern studies examine the northern Gulf Of Mexico shelf associated with or adjacent to the Mississippi River discharge (papers by Boesch and Rabalais; Rabalais, Turner, Wiseman and Boesch; Harper, McKinney, Nance and Salzer)) which discuss effects on benthos, recovery of communities and general oceanographic characteristics of the environment. This area may well be one in which the anoxia has an anthropogenic source as noted in the paper by Rabalais and others. Contrasts with other areas are noted. The effects are of the order of 4-5 months in duration in the delta front area. A paper by Van der Zwaan and Jorissen compares the effects in the northern Adriatic, Orinoco-Paria shelf and the Mississippi locale. All are influenced by high river discharges and pollution effects. The authors utilize benthic foraminifera as indi-