The conversion factor (EF/MAM) was 7.2 in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to 5.1 in controls with sinus rhythm, indicating that MAM is reduced in AF despite similar ejection fraction.
Observational
Does the relationship between mitral annulus motion and left ventricular ejection fraction differ in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to those with sinus rhythm?
The conversion factor to estimate ejection fraction from mitral annulus motion is higher in patients with atrial fibrillation (7.2) than in those with sinus rhythm (5.1), which must be accounted for in clinical assessment.
Absolute Event Rate: 7.2% vs 5.1%
Mitral annulus motion (MAM) has recently been introduced as an index of left ventricular function. Previous studies have shown a good agreement between MAM (mm) x 5 and ejection fraction in middle-aged and elderly patients. These studies only included patients with sinus rhythm, while patients with atrial fibrillation were excluded. In the present study, MAM was reduced in patients with atrial fibrillation while ejection fraction (EF) did not differ from age-matched control patients with sinus rhythm. The 'conversion factor' (EF/MAM) was 7.2 in the group with atrial fibrillation and 5. 1 in controls with sinus rhythm. This difference must be taken into account when MAM is used to estimate left ventricular function in patients with atrial fibrillation. Patients with atrial fibrillation had lower stroke volume and higher heart rate than patients with sinus rhythm. A decreased systolic long-axis shortening was found (P<0.005) compared to patients with sinus rhythm, but no difference in short-axis diameter shortening.
Emilsson et al. (Sat,) conducted a observational in Atrial fibrillation. Mitral annulus motion (MAM) assessment vs. Age-matched controls with sinus rhythm was evaluated on Conversion factor (EF/MAM). The conversion factor (EF/MAM) was 7.2 in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to 5.1 in controls with sinus rhythm, indicating that MAM is reduced in AF despite similar ejection fraction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: