Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This article provides a thorough examination of Franz Magnis-Suseno’s theological and philosophical perspectives on interreligious dialogue and tolerance set against the multicultural backdrop of Indonesia. Operating as a philosopher, theologian, and public intellectual, formulates a well-founded ethical paradigm for sustaining social coexistence in the face of radicalism and the politicisation of faith. Employing qualitative analytical techniques, the study collates his major texts alongside existing scholarly articles to construct a unified evaluation of his thought. The investigation discloses three interdependent pillars underlying contribution: first, a humanistic Christian theological core asserting the inviolable dignity of human beings as the imago Dei and articulating the universal duty of the law of love; second, a philosophical elaboration of Javanese ethical precepts, especially the notions of rukun (harmony) and hormat (respect), which provide a concrete, culturally resonant basis for non-violent coexistence; and third, a critical dialogue with Western normative philosophy—foremost the categorical imperative of Immanuel Kant and the discourse ethics of Jürgen Habermas—that formulates equitable procedural standards for public deliberation. The practice of intellectual inculturation, local knowledge, religious customs, and philosophical insights aims to shape public discourse aimed at addressing intolerance and advancing democracy in Indonesia.
Nasution et al. (Sat,) studied this question.