Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper does a comparative study of commonly used machine learning algorithms in predicting the prevalence of heart diseases.It uses the publicly available Cleveland Dataset and models the classification techniques on it.It brings up the differences between different models and evaluates their accuracies in predicting a heart disease.We have shown that lesser complex models such as logistic regression and support vector machines with linear kernel give more accurate results than their more complex counterparts.We have used F1 score and ROC curves as evaluative measures.Through this effort, we aim to provide a benchmark and improve earlier ones in the field of heart disease diagnostics using machine learning classification techniques.
Khanna et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: