Rotavirus vaccines substantially reduce diarrheal disease and mortality and are cost-effective in countries with high burden, despite lower efficacy compared to high-income settings.
Do oral, live-attenuated rotavirus vaccines reduce diarrheal disease and mortality in children in high-mortality settings?
Rotavirus vaccines are cost-effective and substantially reduce diarrheal disease and mortality in high-burden countries despite lower efficacy compared to high-income settings.
Rotavirus claims thousands of lives of children globally every year with a disproportionately high burden in low- and lower-middle income countries where access to health care is limited. Oral, live-attenuated rotavirus vaccines have been evaluated in multiple settings in both low- and high-income populations and have been shown to be safe and efficacious. However, the vaccine efficacy observed in low-income settings with high rotavirus and diarrheal mortality was significantly lower than that seen in high-income populations where rotavirus mortality is less common. Rotavirus vaccines have been introduced and rolled out in more than 112 countries, providing the opportunity to assess effectiveness of the vaccines in these different settings. We provide an overview of the efficacy, effectiveness, and impact of rotavirus vaccines, focusing on high-mortality settings and identify the knowledge gaps for future research. Despite lower efficacy, rotavirus vaccines substantially reduce diarrheal disease and mortality and are cost-effective in countries with high burden. Continued evaluation of the effectiveness, impact, and cost-benefit of rotavirus vaccines, especially the new candidates that have been recently approved for global use, is a key factor for new vaccine introductions in countries, or for a switch of vaccine product in countries with limited resources.
Varghese et al. (Wed,) conducted a review in Rotavirus and diarrheal disease. Oral, live-attenuated rotavirus vaccines was evaluated. Rotavirus vaccines substantially reduce diarrheal disease and mortality and are cost-effective in countries with high burden, despite lower efficacy compared to high-income settings.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: