Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
2t (n + p) !. . (1. 1) \ = D t (p + t) \ (p -/) ! (-P -l) ! (w2 -t2) Inequality (1. 1) reduces to the well-known Bieberbach conjecture when p -l. The conjecture was proven by Goodman and Robertson 3 for a function in S (p), in case all its coefficients are real and by Robertson 7, in case di = a2= =ap₂ = 0, the remaining coefficients being complex. The author 5 proved (1. 1) for n = p + l for functions in 3C (p), no restrictions being made on the coefficients. In this paper, we will prove (1. 1) for functions of the class X, (p) for the case <i = a2= =aj, ₂ = 0, the remaining coefficients being complex. The case p -2 of our proof gives (1. 1) for the entire class 3C (2). Inequality (1. 1) is known to be true for the class 3C (1).
Albert E. Livingston (Sat,) studied this question.