Peritoneal dialysis patients with preserved ejection fraction showed lower early diastolic strain rate than healthy controls (1.043 vs 1.803 s-1, p<0.001), indicating early diastolic dysfunction.
Case-Control (n=60)
Single-blind
No
Does two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging (2D-STI) detect early left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in young peritoneal dialysis patients with preserved LVEF compared to healthy controls?
Global diastolic strain rate measured by 2D-STI can detect subclinical left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in young peritoneal dialysis patients with preserved LVEF who appear normal on conventional echocardiography.
Absolute Event Rate: 1.043% vs 1.803%
p-value: p=<0.001
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) myocardial longitudinal diastolic strain rate measured by two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging (2D-STI) was proved to have a better correlation with the LV diastolic function. We aimed to use this sensitive tool to predict LV myocardial diastolic dysfunction in young peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients with preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS: We enrolled 30 PD patients aged ≤60 with LVEF ≥54% and classified as normal LV diastolic function by conventional echocardiography, and 30 age- and sex-matched healthy people as the control group. The left atrial maximum volume index (LAVI), LV mass index (LVMI), LVEF, LV posterior wall thickness (LVPWT), interventricular septal thickness (IVST), peak velocity of tricuspid regurgitation (TR), peak early diastolic velocity/late diastolic velocity (by Pulsed Doppler) (E/A) and E/peak velocity of the early diastolic wave (by Pulsed-wave tissue Doppler) (E/e') were recorded by conventional echocardiographic. Next, the average LV global longitudinal systolic strain (GLS avg) and the average LV global longitudinal diastolic strain rate (DSr avg) during early diastole (DSrE avg), late diastole (DSrA avg) and isovolumic relaxation period (DSrIVR avg) were obtained from 2D-STI. Combined them with E, the new noninvasive indexes (E/DSrE avg., E/DSrA avg. and E/DSrIVR avg) were derived. RESULTS: The PD group 's LVEF, E/e', TR and LAVI were in the normal range compared with the controls, and only e' (p < 0.001) was decreased. The LVMI (p < 0.001), LVPWT (p < 0.001), IVST (p < 0.001) increased while E/A (p < 0.001) decreased. The GLS avg. (p = 0.008) was significantly decreased in PD patients compared with the controls. DSrA avg. (p = 0.006) and E/DSrE avg. (p = 0.006) were increased, while DSrE avg. (p < 0.001), DSrIVR avg. (p = 0.017) and E/DSrA avg. (p < 0.001) decreased. After the multivariable regression analysis, the correlation between DSrE and the conventional parameters including LVPWT (p < 0.001), E/A (p < 0.001) still remained significant. CONCLUSIONS: Young PD patients with preserved LVEF already exhibited myocardial diastolic dysfunction. Global diastolic strain rate indexes were valuable parameters to evaluate diastolic dysfunction. Additionally, LVPWT was highly correlated with DSrE, such parameter should be taken into account for predicting the early LV diastolic dysfunction in clinical practice.
Zhu et al. (Tue,) conducted a case-control in End-stage renal disease on peritoneal dialysis (n=60). Peritoneal dialysis vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Early diastolic strain rate (DSrE avg.) (p=<0.001). Peritoneal dialysis patients with preserved ejection fraction showed lower early diastolic strain rate than healthy controls (1.043 vs 1.803 s-1, p<0.001), indicating early diastolic dysfunction.