PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1997Physics in Medicine and Biology110 citations

Single- and dual-energy CT with monochromatic synchrotron x-rays

View Full Paper
FDF. Avraham DilmanianXWX. Y. WuEPEdward C. Parsons

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We explored the potential for clinical research of computed tomography (CT) with monochromatic x-rays using the preclinical multiple energy computed tomography (MECT) system at the National Synchrotron Light Source. MECT has a fixed, horizontal fan beam with a subject apparatus rotating about a vertical axis; it will be used for imaging the human head and neck. Two -photodiode array detectors with different spatial resolutions were used. A 10.5 cm diameter acrylic phantom was imaged with MECT at 43 keV and with a conventional CT (CCT) at 80 kVp: spatial resolution line pairs (lp)/cm for both; slice height, 2.6 mm for MECT against 3.0 mm for CCT; surface dose, 3.1 cGy for MECT against 2.0 cGy for CCT. The resultant image noise was 1.5 HU for MECT against 3 HU for CCT. Computer simulations of the same images with more precisely matched spatial resolution, slice height and dose indicated an image - noise ratio of 1.4:1.0 for CCT against MECT. A 13.5 cm diameter acrylic phantom imaged with MECT at above the iodine K edge and with CCT showed, for a solution, an image contrast of 26 HU for MECT and 13 and 9 HU for the 80 and 100 kVp CCT, respectively. The corresponding numbers from computer simulation of the same images were 26, 12, and 9 HU, respectively. MECT's potential for use in clinical research is discussed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dilmanian et al. (1997) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a15434572316eef384e2267https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/42/2/009
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper