The Social Consequences of Self‐control: Testing the General Theory of Crime*

Gottfredson and Hirschi's recently introduced general theory of crime has received considerable empirical support. Researchers have found that low self‐control, the general theory's core concept, is related to lawbreaking and to deviant behaviors considered by Gottfredson and Hirschi to be “analogous” to crime. In this article, we extend this research by assessing the effects of low self‐control on crime and analogous behaviors and by using two distinct measures of self‐control, an attitudinal measure and the analogous/behavior scale. Thus, following Gottfredson and Hirschi, we use analogous imprudent behaviors as outcomes of low self‐control and as indicators of low self‐control's effects on crime. We also examine an important but thus far neglected part of the theory: the claim that low self‐control has effects not only on crime but also on life chances, life quality, and other social consequences. Consistent with the general theory, we found that both measures of self‐control, attitudinal and behavioral, have effects on crime, even when controlling for a range of social factors. Further, the analysis revealed general support for the theory's prediction of negative relationships between low self‐control and social consequences other than crime—life outcomes and quality of life.