Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
H. M. Minsky's financial instability hypothesis interpretation of Keynes's General Theory is outlined. Two stylized fact extensions are made to Goodwin's (1972) limit cycle model to incorporate the fundamentals of Minsky's hypothesis. The introduction of a 'real' finance sector converts Goodwin's stable system into a chaotic one, with the transition from stability to instability and breakdown determined by the level of interest rate and debt. A stylized government sector counterbalances capitalist tendencies towards euphoric investment and results in a cyclical but stable system. It is surmised that actual governments have developed away from this ideal of countercyclical behavior.
Steve Keen (Sat,) studied this question.