Cardiac magnetic resonance measures such as early peak filling rate <2.1 s-1 and LA maximal volume >52 mL/m2 are reliable indicators of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.
Systematic Review (n=102)
Which cardiac magnetic resonance parameters and thresholds are most reliable for assessing left ventricular diastolic function?
Specific CMR parameters, including LV untwisting, early filling rates, and LA emptying fractions, are promising and reliable measures for diagnosing LV diastolic dysfunction.
Purpose: In recent years, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has been used to assess LV diastolic function. In this systematic review, studies were identified where CMR parameters had been evaluated in healthy and/or patient groups with proven diastolic dysfunction or known to develop heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. We aimed at describing the parameters most often used, thresholds where possible, and correlation to echocardiographic and invasive measurements. Methods and results: A systematic literature review was performed using the databases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. In total, 3808 articles were screened, and 102 studies were included. Four main CMR techniques were identified: tagging; time/volume curves; mitral inflow quantification with velocity-encoded phase-contrast sequences; and feature tracking. Techniques were described and estimates were presented in tables. From published studies, peak change of torsion shear angle versus volume changes in early diastole (−dφ′/dV′) (from tagging analysis), early peak filling rate indexed to LV end-diastolic volume 52 mL/m2, lowered LA total (<40%), and lowered LA passive emptying fractions (<16%) seem to be reliable measures of LV diastolic dysfunction. Feature tracking, especially of the atrium, shows promise but is still a novel technique. Conclusion: CMR techniques of LV untwisting and early filling and LA measures of poor emptying are promising for the diagnosis of LV filling impairment, but further research in long-term follow-up studies is needed to assess the ability for the parameters to predict patient related outcomes.
Bojer et al. (Fri,) conducted a systematic review in Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (n=102). Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was evaluated on CMR parameters and thresholds for LV diastolic dysfunction. Cardiac magnetic resonance measures such as early peak filling rate <2.1 s-1 and LA maximal volume >52 mL/m2 are reliable indicators of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: