Fluid resuscitation in preload-dependent critically ill patients significantly increased the absolute value of global longitudinal strain from -13.3% to -18.4%.
Observational (n=49)
No
Does fluid resuscitation alter global longitudinal strain and systolic strain rate in preload-dependent critically ill patients?
In critically ill patients, global longitudinal strain and systolic strain rate are highly preload-dependent, shifting from pathological to normal values after fluid resuscitation, necessitating cautious interpretation of systolic function in hypovolemic states.
Absolute Event Rate: -18.4% vs -13.3%
p-value: p=<0.01
BACKGROUND: In critical patients, left ventricular ejection fraction and fractional shortening are used to reflect left ventricular systolic function. An emerging technique, two-dimensional-strain echocardiography, allows assessment of the left ventricle systolic longitudinal deformation (global longitudinal strain) and the speed at which this deformation occurs (systolic strain rate). This technique is of increasing use in critical patients in intensive care units and in the peri-operative period where preload constantly varies. Our objective, in this prospective single-center observational study, was to evaluate the effect of fluid resuscitation on two-dimensional-strain echocardiography measurements in preload-dependent critically ill patients. We included 49 patients with preload dependence attested by an increase of at least 10% in the left ventricular outflow track velocity-time integral measured by echocardiography during a passive leg raising maneuver. Echocardiography was performed before fluid resuscitation (echocardiography 1) and after preload independency achievement (echocardiography 2). RESULTS: ± 0.55 (p < 0.001). The fluid resuscitation affects GLS and SSR in preload-dependent patients, with a shift, for GLS, from pathological to normal values. CONCLUSION: In critically ill patients, the assessment of the systolic function by two-dimensional-strain echocardiography needs prior evaluation of preload dependency, in order to adequately interpret this variable. Future studies should assess the ability of global longitudinal strain to guide fluid management in the critically ill patients.
Nafati et al. (Mon,) conducted a observational in Preload dependence in critically ill patients (n=49). Fluid resuscitation vs. Before fluid resuscitation was evaluated on Global longitudinal strain (GLS) (p=<0.01). Fluid resuscitation in preload-dependent critically ill patients significantly increased the absolute value of global longitudinal strain from -13.3% to -18.4%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: