PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 30, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Clinical and molecular landscape of MTAP-deleted thoracic tumors across Western and Asian cohorts: Implications for synthetic lethal targeting.

View Full Paper
HIHiroaki IkushimaKWKousuke WatanabeASA Shinozaki-Ushiku

Key Points

  • This study aims to characterize the clinicogenomic landscape of MTAP-deleted thoracic tumors across different populations.
  • Retrospective analysis of genomic data from two cohorts: AACR Project GENIE (USA, n = 11,091) and C-CAT (Japan, n = 4,851).
  • Assessment of MTAP copy number alterations in lung, pleural, and thymic tumors including mutational burden and survival stratification by molecular subgroup.
  • Examined prevalence, co-mutation patterns with CDKN2A/B, and associations with actionable drivers.
  • MTAP deletion observed in 8.1% of adenocarcinomas and 9.8% of squamous cell carcinomas in GENIE; comparable rates in C-CAT cohort.
  • Strong association of MTAP deletion with CDKN2A/B deletions; rare in their absence.
  • MTAP deletion linked to lower tumor mutational burden (p < 0.01) and shorter survival in EGFR-mutated lung cancer (HR 1.73 [1.24-2.41], p < 0.01).

Abstract

e20713 Background: Methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) deletion creates a synthetic lethal vulnerability to protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) and methionine adenosyltransferase 2A (MAT2A) inhibition. While early-phase trials targeting this pathway are ongoing, the clinicogenomic context of MTAP-deleted tumors remains incompletely characterized across diverse populations, despite its importance for optimizing patient selection and combination strategies. We utilized large-scale data to characterize MTAP deficiency in US and Japanese cohorts. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed genomic profiling data from two independent nationwide cohorts: AACR Project GENIE (United States; evaluable n = 11,091) and the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT; Japan; evaluable n = 4,851). MTAP copy number alterations were assessed in lung, pleural, and thymic tumors. Analyses included histology-specific prevalence, co-mutation patterns with CDKN2A/B and other genes, associations with clinically actionable drivers, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and overall survival stratified by molecular subgroup. Results: In lung cancer, MTAP deletion occurred at comparable frequencies between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma within each cohort (GENIE: 8.1% vs 9.8%; C-CAT: 19.6% vs 16.5%) but was rare in small cell lung cancer (GENIE: 1.0%; C-CAT: 1.9%). In thymic tumors, MTAP deletion was observed predominantly in thymic carcinoma (9.7%; 25.6%) and was uncommon in thymoma (0%; 3.2%). MTAP deletion was strongly associated with CDKN2A/B deletions and was rare in their absence. MTAP deletion frequently co-existed with actionable driver alterations, including EGFR mutations, ALK fusions, and ERBB2 alterations. A robust inverse association with RB1 mutations was observed in both cohorts. While MTAP deletion appeared associated with lower TMB (p < 0.01) and shorter overall survival in EGFR-mutated lung cancer (HR 1.73 1.24-2.41, p < 0.01), these associations were largely attributable to enrichment of oncogenic drivers and concurrent CDKN2A loss, respectively. Conclusions: MTAP-deleted thoracic tumors exhibit reproducible clinical and molecular features across Western and Asian populations, characterized by frequent co-occurrence with actionable drivers and mutual exclusivity with RB1 alterations. Careful consideration of co-existing driver alterations and CDKN2A status is essential for interpreting prognosis and immunotherapy-related biomarkers. Our findings support the rational, globally applicable development of PRMT5/MAT2A-targeted synthetic lethal strategies in thoracic malignancies, particularly in combination with molecular targeted agents.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ikushima et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a80c00307b78509432bcfhttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e20713
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper