PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 30, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Longitudinal assessment of circulating tumor DNA as a disease monitoring biomarker in soft tissue sarcoma.

View Full Paper
ASAnkur SheelEFErin A. FetzerMHMarium Husain

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the dynamics of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a biomarker for monitoring disease in soft tissue sarcoma (STS).
  • Retrospective analysis of plasma-derived ctDNA from 57 STS patients enrolled in a prospective EHR-based registry (NCT02677961).
  • ctDNA assessed using Tempus (n=34) and Signatera (n=23) platforms, comparing levels with tumor volume and histologic grade.
  • Sequential ctDNA measurements were analyzed for correlation with tumor dynamics during treatment.
  • ctDNA was detectable in over 75% of patients, with levels correlating strongly with tumor volume (Signatera r=0.84, p=2.04×10⁻⁹; Tempus r=0.63, p=0.0375).
  • Higher histologic grades were associated with significant ctDNA detection (p=0.0217), while surgical stage showed no correlation (p=0.666).
  • For 20 patients with serial ctDNA sampling, increases in ctDNA preceded radiographic evidence of disease progression in 82% of cases.

Abstract

e23523 Background: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) comprise a heterogeneous group of malignancies with limited biomarkers for real-time disease monitoring. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents a minimally invasive approach to assess tumor burden and treatment response; however, its clinical utility in STS remains incompletely defined. We evaluated ctDNA dynamics across diverse STS subtypes in a real-world clinical cohort. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed plasma-derived ctDNA from 57 patients with STS enrolled in a prospective EHR-based Comprehensive Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Registry (NCT02677961) at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center. ctDNA was assessed using Tempus (n = 34) and Signatera (n = 23) platforms. ctDNA levels were compared with radiographic tumor volume, histologic grade, and disease stage. Tumor burden was quantified using volumetric imaging, and clinical response was assessed by RECIST criteria or physician evaluation. Serial ctDNA measurements were available for a subset of patients. Results: ctDNA was detectable in over 75% of patients. ctDNA levels strongly correlated with tumor volume in both the Signatera (Spearman r = 0.84, p = 2.04 × 10⁻⁹) and Tempus (Spearman r = 0.63, p = 0.0375) cohorts. ctDNA detection was significantly associated with higher histologic grade (p = 0.0217), with Grade 3 tumors demonstrating the highest detection rates. ctDNA presence was not associated with surgical stage (p = 0.666). Among 20 patients with serial sampling, ctDNA dynamics closely mirrored changes in tumor burden during surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. The sensitivity of ctDNA detection in patients with radiographically evident disease was 79.2%, and in 82% of cases, increases in ctDNA levels preceded radiographic evidence of disease progression across histological subtypes. Conclusions: In this real-world STS cohort, ctDNA levels were associated with tumor burden, histologic grade, and longitudinal treatment response across multiple sarcoma subtypes and assay platforms, with ctDNA increases frequently preceding radiographic disease progression. These findings support ctDNA as a promising biomarker for real-time disease monitoring in STS and provide a rationale for incorporation into prospective sarcoma clinical trials. Larger, multi-institutional studies are warranted to validate these observations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sheel et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a81100307b78509432f59https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e23523
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper