PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 30, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Real-world study on the effect of PARPi as maintenance therapy on recurrent site after first-line chemotherapy in patients with high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer.

View Full Paper
YGYanglong GuoYZY M Zhang

Key Points

  • This study examines how PARPi maintenance therapy affects recurrence locations in patients with high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer after chemotherapy.
  • Retrospective analysis of 173 patients treated from January 2017 to March 2024
  • PARPi group included 63 patients, control group had 110 patients
  • Assessments focused on recurrence rates in pelvic, abdominal peritoneum, and lymph nodes.
  • PARPi group had 38 pelvic and abdominal peritoneum recurrences (HR: 2.37, 95% CI 1.63-3.47, P < 0.0001)
  • No significant difference in lymph node recurrence (HR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.69-1.26, P=0.72)
  • BRCA mutations did not significantly alter the recurrence locations in PARPi users.

Abstract

e17593 Background: This study investigated the effect of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) as maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy on recurrent site in patients with high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 173 patients with HGSOC treated at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital and Jiaxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital between January 2017 and March 2024. The PARPi group comprised patients who received a PARPi as maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy (n=63), and the control group comprised those who did not (n=110). Results: There were no differences in both groups regarding age, body mass index (BMI), residual tumor after initial surgery, efficacy evaluation after first-line chemotherapy (P > 0.05). Among the 63 patients in the PARPi group and the 110 patients in the control group, thirty-eight and 28 whose recurrent site were widespread pelvic and abdominal peritoneum, respectively (hazard ratio HR: 2.37, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.63-3.47, P < 0.0001). However, there was no significant statistical difference in lymph nodes recurrence between the two groups (HR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.69-1.26, P=0.72). In the subgroup analysis of the PARPi group, among 36 patients with breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutations and 10 homologous recombination deficiency(HRD) negative patients, 21 and 7 patients developed pelvic and abdominal peritoneum recurrence (HR: 0.83, 95% CI 0.54-1.54, P=0.50), while 20 and 5 patients developed lymph node recurrence (HR: 1.11, 95% CI 0.63-2.45, P=0.75) respectively, with no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: Patients with HGSOC using a PARPi as maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy were more likely to cause widespread pelvic abdominal peritoneal recurrence while lymph node recurrence were similar to those who did not receive PARPi. BRCA status did not affect the recurrent site when using a PARPi as maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy. We should pay attention to these patients because using a PARPi as maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy might change the location and characteristics of recurrent lesions, which might affect the complete resection rate of secondary cytoreductive surgery Recurrence site analysis. Widespread pelvic abdominal peritoneal recurrence No widespread pelvic abdominal peritoneal recurrence Total PARPi 38 25 63 no PARPi 28 82 110 Total 66 107 173 Lymph node recurrence No lymph node recurrence Total PARPi 32 31 63 no PARPi 59 51 110 Total 91 82 173 widespread pelvic abdominal peritoneal recurrence no widespread pelvic abdominal peritoneal recurrence Total BRCA1/2 mutation 21 15 36 HRD negative 7 3 10 Total 28 18 46 Lymph node recurrence no Lymph node recurrence Total BRCA1/2 mutation 20 16 36 HRD negative 5 5 10 Total 25 21 46

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a812b0307b785094331c2https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e17593
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 11068 Platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer recurrence after PARP-inhibitor maintenance at first line: a real-world scenario2024
  2. 2624 Benefit from maintenance with parp inhibitor in newly diagnosed ovarian cancer according to the mutation type and site2024
  3. 3PARPis after PARPis in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a single institutional experience2025
  4. 4Subsequent management and outcomes after first-line PARP inhibitors progression in ovarian cancer patients2024 · 5 citations
  5. 5PARPi maintenance may attenuate the adverse prognosis of residual disease after debulking surgery in HRD-positive advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: an exploratory real-world analysis2026