PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 30, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Adjuvant pembrolizumab in clear cell renal cell carcinoma with high recurrence risk: A multicenter real-world study.

View Full Paper
LGLiangyou GuChinese PLA General HospitalYDYicong DuPeking UniversitySZShimiao ZhuSecond Hospital of Tianjin Medical University

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant pembrolizumab in patients with high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).
  • Multicenter retrospective study with 396 enrolled patients aged 18-80 with high-risk ccRCC.
  • Patients receiving pembrolizumab (114) were matched to an observation group (282) using propensity score matching.
  • Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).
  • Disease recurrence was 6.7% (6/90) in the pembrolizumab group versus 22.4% (36/161) in the observation group (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.23–1.00).
  • 24-month DFS rate was 90.5% in the pembrolizumab group versus 73.2% in the observation group.
  • TRAEs occurred in 50.8% of treated patients, with severe events leading to treatment discontinuation in 10.5%.

Abstract

e16538 Background: Pembrolizumab has demonstrated efficacy in improving disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) as adjuvant therapy in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) at high risk of recurrence. However, real-world evidence supporting its use in Chinese patients remains limited. This study evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of adjuvant pembrolizumab in a multicenter cohort. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study recruited 18–80-year-old patients with high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). High-risk status was defined as either M0 disease with adverse pathological features (pT2 with grade 4/sarcomatoid differentiation, any pT3/T4, or any pT with N1) or M1 oligometastatic disease achieving no evidence of disease (NED) after complete resection. The treatment cohort included patients who received at least one cycle of adjuvant pembrolizumab and was 1:2 matched to an observation cohort via propensity score matching to achieve baseline balance. The primary endpoint was DFS; secondary endpoints included OS and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Results: Between January 2023 and December 2025, 396 patients were enrolled, including 114 who received pembrolizumab and 282 managed with observation. Baseline imbalances in age, M stage, and nuclear grade were observed before matching. After matching, 90 patients in the pembrolizumab group and 161 in the observation group were analyzed, with well-balanced baseline characteristics. At the data cutoff (December 31, 2025), median follow-up was 13.1 months in the pembrolizumab group and 24.6 months in the observation group. Disease recurrence occurred in 6.7% (6/90) of patients receiving pembrolizumab compared with 22.4% (36/161) in the observation cohort. Median DFS was not reached in either group (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.23–1.00). The 24-month DFS rate was 90.5% in the pembrolizumab group versus 73.2% in the observation group. TRAEs were reported in 50.8% of treated patients, predominantly grade 1-2. Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 13.3% of patients, and grade 4 events were limited to two cases of immune-related myocarditis. The most common TRAEs included rash (21.3%), proteinuria (12.2%) and thyroid dysfunction (10.2%). Severe adverse events (SAEs) led to treatment discontinuation in 10.5% of patients, with hypothyroidism (3.5%), colitis (2.6%) and hypertransaminasemia (2.6%) as the most frequent events, and no treatment-related deaths were noted. Retrospective study design and short follow-up limit long-term outcome assessment. Conclusions: In this multicenter real-world Chinese cohort, adjuvant pembrolizumab was associated with improved DFS and a manageable safety profile in patients with high-risk ccRCC. Larger studies with longer follow-up are warranted to further validate these findings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a827f0307b78509434303https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e16538
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Real-world evidences on adjuvant Pembrolizumab for renal cell carcinoma: results from the multicenter real-world ARON-1 study2025
  2. 2Metastatic progression and toxicity in high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients treated with adjuvant pembrolizumab at a tertiary care center.2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Real-World Outcomes of Adjuvant Pembrolizumab for Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Potential Role of PD-L1 as a Prognostic Biomarker2026
  4. 4Real‐World Occurrence of Adverse Events Associated With Adjuvant Pembrolizumab Therapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5Real-world survival outcomes and prognostic factors with adjuvant pembrolizumab for renal cell carcinoma.2026