Introduction: The nanotechnology era has developed silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) that are emerging as a next-generation platform for diagnosis, targeted drug delivery, and therapeutic intervention with advanced cancer treatment. Methods: Emerging cancer nanomedicine often utilizes biogenic synthesis through plant extracts or microorganisms, providing a sustainable and cost-effective alternative to traditional chemical methods to form Bio-AgNPs. This eco-friendly approach results in biocompatible nanoparticles that avoid additional toxicity from synthetic chemicals and are enriched with phytochemicals like flavonoids and phenolics, which enhance their pharmacological potency against cancer. Charac-terization techniques such as UV-Vis, FTIR, XRD, DLS, SEM, and TEM, etc., are employed to determine surface morphologies, which significantly impact the cancer theragnostic. Results: Bio-AgNPs with suitable functionalities can activate multiple pathway mechanisms for cancer therapy. These include ROS-mediated oxidative stress, DNA damage, G2/M cell cycle arrest, and the modulation of downstream apoptotic or anti-apoptotic pathways. Additionally, these nanoparticles ensure preferential site-specific cargo delivery, thereby minimizing systemic toxicity. Discussion: Despite gaining popularity among nano-metals, there are several pitfalls regarding clinical status, regulatory limitations, clinical trials, and toxicity. These include issues such as variability, limited scalability in bulk synthesis, and challenges in long-term risk assessment. Conclusion: This review article highlights the potential of Bio-AgNPs to transform cancer treatment through the integration with mechanistic pathways and multifunctional strategies. These include ligand-directed targeting, stimuli-responsive drug release, and molecular imaging within a single nanoscale platform. Additionally, the article addresses the key challenges that must be overcome to enable the successful clinical translation of these technologies.
Prusty et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: