Does normal flow reperfusion compared to low flow reperfusion increase dominant frequency and minimum defibrillation energy in isolated fibrillating swine hearts?
In a swine model of ventricular fibrillation, low flow reperfusion reduces myocardial excitability and lowers defibrillation energy requirements compared to normal flow reperfusion.
This study assessed the influence of rates of reperfusion on excitability of the myocardium using dominant frequency (DF) (in Hz) of VF and the relationship of DF to the minimum defibrillation energy (MDE) (in J). Our hypothesis was that increasing flow during reperfusion increases DF that raises MDE. Initially, six Langendorff perfused swine hearts were serially fibrillated and perfusion arrested for 4 minutes followed by reperfusion and defibrillation to establish reproducibility of the model. The epicardial ECG was analyzed for DF. In subsequent studies (n = 8), no flow VF was followed by 1-minute reperfusion at normal flow or 10% flow (low flow) and shocked with increasing energy via epicardial pads until defibrillation. The DF at onset of no flow VF was 9.5 +/- 1.4 and decreased to 3.6 +/- 1.4 after 4 minutes. Reperfusion at normal flow increased the DF of VF compared to low flow after 1 minute (10.8 +/- 1.1 vs 4.5 +/- 1.1 Hz, P = 0.0002) and was associated with increased defibrillation energy requirements (13.5 +/- 5.0 vs 7.3 +/- 6.2 J, P = 0.047). In summary, defibrillation energy requirements are lower when myocardial excitability is reduced during low flow reperfusion.
Barton et al. (Sat,) studied this question.