PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 2001International Psychogeriatrics34 citationsOpen Access

Depression in Primary Care 2: General Practitioners' Recognition of Major Depression in Elderly Patients

View Full Paper
DODaniel O’ConnorAssociation of the British Pharmaceutical IndustryRRRichard C RosewarneIP AustraliaABAnn BruceVeterans Health Administration

Key Result

General practitioners' assessments of mood concurred with ICD-10 research diagnoses in 66% of mild and 88% of moderate or severe depressive episodes in elderly patients.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=1,021)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

How accurately do general practitioners recognize major depression in elderly patients compared to structured research interviews?

P
Population
1,021 patients aged 70+ years of 30 general practitioners in Melbourne, Australia
I
Intervention
General practitioners' clinical assessment of depression
C
Comparator
Canberra Interview for the Elderly (generating ICD-10 research diagnoses)
O
Outcome
General practitioners' recognition of depression

While general practitioners recognize moderate to severe depression well in elderly patients, they miss many specific symptoms and have high false positive rates, suggesting a need for symptom checklists.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is important that serious depressive illness be recognized and treated appropriately by primary care practitioners. This and the preceding article in this issue examine (a) factors responsible for older patients' decision to report depressive symptoms to their doctor and (b) general practitioners' (GPs') recognition of depression when it was present. METHODS: A survey was conducted of a stratified sample of 1,021 patients aged 70+ years of 30 GPs in Melbourne, Australia, using the Canberra Interview for the Elderly, which generates rigorous ICD-10 research diagnoses. RESULTS: GPs' ratings of depression were best predicted in descending order of importance by patients' past contact with a psychiatrist, the doctor's view that a patient did not have dementia, the number of current depressive symptoms, patients' disclosure of these symptoms, and current physical pain. Physicians' assessments of patients' mood concurred with research diagnoses in 23 of 35 (66%) cases of ICD-10 mild depressive episode and 23 of 26 (88%) cases of moderate or severe depressive episode. GPs were unaware, however, of many depressive symptoms and often rated patients as being depressed when they were not. CONCLUSION: The use of a simple checklist of depressive symptoms would lead to a dramatic improvement in doctors' knowledge of patients' current psychiatric status.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

O’Connor et al. (2001) conducted a cross-sectional in Major Depression (n=1,021). General practitioners' assessment vs. ICD-10 research diagnoses was evaluated on Concurrence of GPs' assessments of patients' mood with ICD-10 research diagnoses. General practitioners' assessments of mood concurred with ICD-10 research diagnoses in 66% of mild and 88% of moderate or severe depressive episodes in elderly patients.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1b48a139ea7417dc42a8e1https://doi.org/10.1017/s104161020100775x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper