Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVCommunicationNEXTA New Cyclic Pseudopeptide Receptor for Li+ from a Dynamic Combinatorial LibraryRicardo L. E. Furlan, Yiu-Fai Ng, Sijbren Otto, and Jeremy K. M. SandersView Author Information Cambridge Centre for Molecular Recognition University Chemical Laboratory Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 36, 8876–8877Publication Date (Web):August 18, 2001Publication History Received24 April 2001Revised26 July 2001Published online18 August 2001Published inissue 1 September 2001https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja0160703https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0160703rapid-communicationACS PublicationsCopyright © 2001 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views1073Altmetric-Citations105LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-AlertscloseSupporting Info (2)»Supporting Information Supporting Information SUBJECTS:Cations,Macrocycles,Mixtures,Peptides and proteins,Receptors Get e-Alerts
Furlán et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: