PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 6, 2005184 citations

Physics-motivated features for distinguishing photographic images and computer graphics

View Full Paper
TNTian-Tsong NgSCShih‐Fu ChangJHJessie Hsu

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The increasing photorealism for computer graphics has made computer graphics a convincing form of image forgery. Therefore, classifying photographic images and photorealistic computer graphics has become an important problem for image forgery detection. In this paper, we propose a new geometry-based image model, motivated by the physical image generation process, to tackle the above-mentioned problem. The proposed model reveals certain physical differences between the two image categories, such as the gamma correction in photographic images and the sharp structures in computer graphics. For the problem of image forgery detection, we propose two levels of image authenticity definition, i.e., imaging-process authenticity and scene authenticity, and analyze our technique against these definitions. Such definition is important for making the concept of image authenticity computable. Apart from offering physical insights, our technique with a classification accuracy of 83.5% outperforms those in the prior work, i.e., wavelet features at 80.3% and cartoon features at 71.0%. We also consider a recapturing attack scenario and propose a counter-attack measure. In addition, we constructed a publicly available benchmark dataset with images of diverse content and computer graphics of high photorealism.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ng et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1c01a369a4af5b15a9408fhttps://doi.org/10.1145/1101149.1101192
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper