PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1979Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology18 citations

Temporary Pacemaker Treatment in Open Heart Surgery: Variation in Myocardial Threshold, Tissue and Interface Impedances in Man*

View Full Paper
OOOle‐Jørgen OhmLMLars MørkridESErling Skagseth

Structured PICO

How do myocardial threshold and tissue impedances change postoperatively in patients receiving temporary pacemakers during open heart surgery?

P
Population
28 patients undergoing open heart surgery
I
Intervention
Temporary pacemaker treatment with adequately insulated multicore metal electrodes
O
Outcome
Myocardial threshold, tissue impedance, and electrode/tissue interface impedancessurrogate

Postoperative changes in tissue impedance and myocardial threshold significantly increase the load on constant-voltage generators, potentially leading to stimulation failure during temporary pacing.

Abstract

Myocardial threshold and impedance of adequately insulated multicore metal electrodes (lengths l1 and l2) were investigated in 28 patients undergoing open heart surgery. Increase in current threshold from the pre-to postoperative period was: 607 +/- 102% (mean +/- SEM) with a constant-current pulse generator and 885 +/- 129% with a constant-voltage pulse generator. Tissue impedance (RT - initial impendance) calculated as voltage/current ratio 90 mus into the pulse changed from 564 +/- 34 omega before surgery to a minimum of 134 +/- 7 omega. Thereafter, there was a gradual increase in RT to 162 +/- 9 omega the day of electrode removal. In 25 of 28 patients the minimum values were reached the third to eighth postoperative day. Electrode/tissue interface impedances--Faraday resistance (RF) and Helmholtz capacity (CH)--were calculated from regression analysis of loaded and unloaded electrograms using the method of least squares. The RF showed a fall from 14.7 +/- 1.4 K omega to 5.2 +/- 0.3 K omega, and the CH (20-40 Hz) rose from 6.0 +/- 0.9 mu F to 15.5 +/- 0.8 muF preoperatively to the day of minimum tissue impedance. There were no further changes until the day of electrode removal. A significant positive correlation was found between CH (p < 0.002), current threshold (p < 0.005) and equivalent electrode length lequ = l1 X l2/(l1 + l2). The electrode signal source impedance calculated from RT, RF and CH was of a magnitude not likely to contribute to demand failures. The low postoperative electrode impendance resulted in excessive load on the constant-voltage generator (condenser discharge type), rendering stimulation of the heart with reasonable current values impossible.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ohm et al. (1979) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1c9d2f7706020b13a46658https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1979.tb05196.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper