Left ventricular measurements by the volume method had the best reproducibility compared with dimension and area methods in pediatric patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (P≤0.01).
Observational (n=169)
Yes
Dilated cardiomyopathy (n=169)
Left ventricular volume measurement vs Dimension and area measurement methods
Intraobserver, interobserver, interacquisition, and interobserver-acquisition reproducibility, p=≤0.01
p-value: p=≤0.01
Background— Multiple echocardiographic methods are used to measure left ventricular size and function. Clinical management is based on individual evaluations and longitudinal trends. The Pediatric Heart Network VVV study (Ventricular Volume Variability) in pediatric patients with dilated cardiomyopathy has reported reproducibility of several of these measures, and how disease state and number of beats impact their reproducibility. In this study, we investigated the impact of observer and sonographer variation on reproducibility of dimension, area, and volume methods to determine the best method for both individual and sequential evaluations. Methods and Results— In 8 centers, echocardiograms were obtained on 169 patients prospectively. During the same visit, 2 different sonographers acquired the same imaging protocol on each patient. Each acquisition was analyzed by 2 different observers; first observer analyzed the first acquisition twice. Intraobserver, interobserver, interacquisition, and interobserver-acquisition (different observers and different acquisition) reproducibility were assessed on measurements of left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, area, and volume. Left ventricular shortening fraction, ejection fraction, mass, and fractional area change were calculated. Percent difference was calculated as (interobservation difference/mean)×100. Interobserver reproducibility for both acquisitions was better for both volume and dimension measurements ( P ≤0.002) compared with area measurements, whereas intraobserver, interacquisition (for both observers), and interobserver-acquisition reproducibilities (for both observer-acquisition sets) were best for volume measurements ( P ≤0.01). Overall, interobserver-acquisition percent differences were significantly higher than interobserver and interacquisition percent differences ( P <0.001). Conclusions— In pediatric patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, compared with dimension and area methods, left ventricular measurements by volume method have the best reproducibility in settings where assessment is not performed by the same personnel. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00123071.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tierney et al. (Wed,) conducted a observational in Dilated cardiomyopathy (n=169). Left ventricular volume measurement vs. Dimension and area measurement methods was evaluated on Intraobserver, interobserver, interacquisition, and interobserver-acquisition reproducibility (p=≤0.01). Left ventricular measurements by the volume method had the best reproducibility compared with dimension and area methods in pediatric patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (P≤0.01).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1dcf1ed10dad54e1ef596a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circimaging.116.006007
Elif Seda Selamet Tierney
Lucile Packard Children's Hospital
Danielle Hollenbeck-Pringle
University of Illinois Chicago
Caroline K. Lee
Washington University in St. Louis
Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging
Stanford University
University of Pennsylvania
University of Toronto
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: