This cross-sectional observational study (2021-2024) evaluated student attitudes and perceptions regarding interprofessional learning and teamwork following an interprofessional pharmacology activity. Students in the first-year professional pharmacy (P1), third-year nursing (BSN3), and third-year medical (MED3) programs were organized into interprofessional groups and tasked with preparing and delivering 15-minute presentations (either in person or online) on clinically relevant pharmacology topics as applied to a clinical case. Students' attitudes and perceptions were assessed using a 17-item survey derived from the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS), using a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics, Kruskal - Wallis tests, and Mann - Whitney U tests were used for analysis. Out of 659 participants, 464 completed the survey (70%), with higher response rates among nursing students (72%) and for in-person sessions (81%). Factor analysis revealed two underlying domains, interprofessional education (IPE) and teamwork, with excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.97 and 0.95, respectively). The majority of students (77% in each discipline) expressed agreement with both IPE and teamwork. The overall mean scores were similar across disciplines (3.92 ± 0.07 for Pharmacy, 3.95 ± 0.07 for Nursing, 3.92 ± 0.08 for Medicine) and academic years (3.93 ± 0.08 for 2021, 4.07 ± 0.08 for 2022, 3.90 ± 0.08 for 2023, 3.80 ± 0.09 for 2024). Kruskal - Wallis tests indicated no significant differences by discipline or year on the overall score and subscales. Mann - Whitney U tests revealed no differences in average ratings between in-person (3.92 ± 0.05) and online formats (3.94 ± 0.07). These findings suggest that the IPE pharmacology activity fostered positive perceptions of interprofessional collaboration, consistently across disciplines, years, and delivery modes.
Milane et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: